18 KiB
Log Contexts
To help track the processing of individual requests, synapse uses a
'log context' to track which request it is handling at any given moment.
This is done via a thread-local variable; a logging.Filter
is then used to fish the information back out of the thread-local
variable and add it to each log record.
Logcontexts are also used for CPU and database accounting, so that we can track which requests were responsible for high CPU use or database activity.
The synapse.logging.context
module provides a facilities
for managing the current log context (as well as providing the
LoggingContextFilter
class).
Deferreds make the whole thing complicated, so this document describes how it all works, and how to write code which follows the rules.
Logcontexts without Deferreds
In the absence of any Deferred voodoo, things are simple enough. As with any code of this nature, the rule is that our function should leave things as it found them:
from synapse.logging import context # omitted from future snippets
def handle_request(request_id):
= context.LoggingContext()
request_context
= context.LoggingContext.current_context()
calling_context
context.LoggingContext.set_current_context(request_context)try:
= request_id
request_context.request
do_request_handling()"finished")
logger.debug(finally:
context.LoggingContext.set_current_context(calling_context)
def do_request_handling():
"phew") # this will be logged against request_id logger.debug(
LoggingContext implements the context management methods, so the above can be written much more succinctly as:
def handle_request(request_id):
with context.LoggingContext() as request_context:
= request_id
request_context.request
do_request_handling()"finished")
logger.debug(
def do_request_handling():
"phew") logger.debug(
Using logcontexts with Deferreds
Deferreds — and in particular, defer.inlineCallbacks
—
break the linear flow of code so that there is no longer a single entry
point where we should set the logcontext and a single exit point where
we should remove it.
Consider the example above, where do_request_handling
needs to do some blocking operation, and returns a deferred:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def handle_request(request_id):
with context.LoggingContext() as request_context:
= request_id
request_context.request yield do_request_handling()
"finished") logger.debug(
In the above flow:
- The logcontext is set
do_request_handling
is called, and returns a deferredhandle_request
yields the deferred- The
inlineCallbacks
wrapper ofhandle_request
returns a deferred
So we have stopped processing the request (and will probably go on to start processing the next), without clearing the logcontext.
To circumvent this problem, synapse code assumes that, wherever you have a deferred, you will want to yield on it. To that end, whereever functions return a deferred, we adopt the following conventions:
Rules for functions returning deferreds:
- If the deferred is already complete, the function returns with the same logcontext it started with.
- If the deferred is incomplete, the function clears the logcontext before returning; when the deferred completes, it restores the logcontext before running any callbacks.
That sounds complicated, but actually it means a lot of code (including the example above) "just works". There are two cases:
If
do_request_handling
returns a completed deferred, then the logcontext will still be in place. In this case, execution will continue immediately after theyield
; the "finished" line will be logged against the right context, and thewith
block restores the original context before we return to the caller.If the returned deferred is incomplete,
do_request_handling
clears the logcontext before returning. The logcontext is therefore clear whenhandle_request
yields the deferred. At that point, theinlineCallbacks
wrapper adds a callback to the deferred, and returns another (incomplete) deferred to the caller, and it is safe to begin processing the next request.Once
do_request_handling
's deferred completes, it will reinstate the logcontext, before running the callback added by theinlineCallbacks
wrapper. That callback runs the second half ofhandle_request
, so again the "finished" line will be logged against the right context, and thewith
block restores the original context.
As an aside, it's worth noting that handle_request
follows our rules -though that only matters if the caller has its own
logcontext which it cares about.
The following sections describe pitfalls and helpful patterns when implementing these rules.
Always yield your deferreds
Whenever you get a deferred back from a function, you should
yield
on it as soon as possible. (Returning it directly to
your caller is ok too, if you're not doing
inlineCallbacks
.) Do not pass go; do not do any logging; do
not call any other functions.
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def fun():
"starting")
logger.debug(yield do_some_stuff() # just like this
= more_stuff()
d = yield d # also fine, of course
result
defer.returnValue(result)
def nonInlineCallbacksFun():
"just a wrapper really")
logger.debug(return do_some_stuff() # this is ok too - the caller will yield on
# it anyway.
Provided this pattern is followed all the way back up to the
callchain to where the logcontext was set, this will make things work
out ok: provided do_some_stuff
and more_stuff
follow the rules above, then so will fun
(as wrapped by
inlineCallbacks
) and
nonInlineCallbacksFun
.
It's all too easy to forget to yield
: for instance if we
forgot that do_some_stuff
returned a deferred, we might
plough on regardless. This leads to a mess; it will probably work itself
out eventually, but not before a load of stuff has been logged against
the wrong context. (Normally, other things will break, more obviously,
if you forget to yield
, so this tends not to be a major
problem in practice.)
Of course sometimes you need to do something a bit fancier with your Deferreds - not all code follows the linear A-then-B-then-C pattern. Notes on implementing more complex patterns are in later sections.
Where you create a new Deferred, make it follow the rules
Most of the time, a Deferred comes from another synapse function. Sometimes, though, we need to make up a new Deferred, or we get a Deferred back from external code. We need to make it follow our rules.
The easy way to do it is with a combination of
defer.inlineCallbacks
, and
context.PreserveLoggingContext
. Suppose we want to
implement sleep
, which returns a deferred which will run
its callbacks after a given number of seconds. That might look like:
# not a logcontext-rules-compliant function
def get_sleep_deferred(seconds):
= defer.Deferred()
d None)
reactor.callLater(seconds, d.callback, return d
That doesn't follow the rules, but we can fix it by wrapping it with
PreserveLoggingContext
and yield
ing on
it:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def sleep(seconds):
with PreserveLoggingContext():
yield get_sleep_deferred(seconds)
This technique works equally for external functions which return deferreds, or deferreds we have made ourselves.
You can also use context.make_deferred_yieldable
, which
just does the boilerplate for you, so the above could be written:
def sleep(seconds):
return context.make_deferred_yieldable(get_sleep_deferred(seconds))
Fire-and-forget
Sometimes you want to fire off a chain of execution, but not wait for its result. That might look a bit like this:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def do_request_handling():
yield foreground_operation()
# *don't* do this
background_operation()
"Request handling complete")
logger.debug(
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def background_operation():
yield first_background_step()
"Completed first step")
logger.debug(yield second_background_step()
"Completed second step") logger.debug(
The above code does a couple of steps in the background after
do_request_handling
has finished. The log lines are still
logged against the request_context
logcontext, which may or
may not be desirable. There are two big problems with the above,
however. The first problem is that, if background_operation
returns an incomplete Deferred, it will expect its caller to
yield
immediately, so will have cleared the logcontext. In
this example, that means that 'Request handling complete' will be logged
without any context.
The second problem, which is potentially even worse, is that when the
Deferred returned by background_operation
completes, it
will restore the original logcontext. There is nothing waiting on that
Deferred, so the logcontext will leak into the reactor and possibly get
attached to some arbitrary future operation.
There are two potential solutions to this.
One option is to surround the call to
background_operation
with a
PreserveLoggingContext
call. That will reset the logcontext
before starting background_operation
(so the context
restored when the deferred completes will be the empty logcontext), and
will restore the current logcontext before continuing the foreground
process:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def do_request_handling():
yield foreground_operation()
# start background_operation off in the empty logcontext, to
# avoid leaking the current context into the reactor.
with PreserveLoggingContext():
background_operation()
# this will now be logged against the request context
"Request handling complete") logger.debug(
Obviously that option means that the operations done in
background_operation
would be not be logged against a
logcontext (though that might be fixed by setting a different logcontext
via a with LoggingContext(...)
in
background_operation
).
The second option is to use context.run_in_background
,
which wraps a function so that it doesn't reset the logcontext even when
it returns an incomplete deferred, and adds a callback to the returned
deferred to reset the logcontext. In other words, it turns a function
that follows the Synapse rules about logcontexts and Deferreds into one
which behaves more like an external function — the opposite operation to
that described in the previous section. It can be used like this:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def do_request_handling():
yield foreground_operation()
context.run_in_background(background_operation)
# this will now be logged against the request context
"Request handling complete") logger.debug(
Passing synapse deferreds into third-party functions
A typical example of this is where we want to collect together two or
more deferred via defer.gatherResults
:
= operation1()
d1 = operation2()
d2 = defer.gatherResults([d1, d2]) d3
This is really a variation of the fire-and-forget problem above, in
that we are firing off d1
and d2
without
yielding on them. The difference is that we now have third-party code
attached to their callbacks. Anyway either technique given in the Fire-and-forget section will work.
Of course, the new Deferred returned by gatherResults
needs to be wrapped in order to make it follow the logcontext rules
before we can yield it, as described in Where
you create a new Deferred, make it follow the rules.
So, option one: reset the logcontext before starting the operations to be gathered:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def do_request_handling():
with PreserveLoggingContext():
= operation1()
d1 = operation2()
d2 = yield defer.gatherResults([d1, d2]) result
In this case particularly, though, option two, of using
context.preserve_fn
almost certainly makes more sense, so
that operation1
and operation2
are both logged
against the original logcontext. This looks like:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def do_request_handling():
= context.preserve_fn(operation1)()
d1 = context.preserve_fn(operation2)()
d2
with PreserveLoggingContext():
= yield defer.gatherResults([d1, d2]) result
Was all this really necessary?
The conventions used work fine for a linear flow where everything
happens in series via defer.inlineCallbacks
and
yield
, but are certainly tricky to follow for any more
exotic flows. It's hard not to wonder if we could have done something
else.
We're not going to rewrite Synapse now, so the following is entirely of academic interest, but I'd like to record some thoughts on an alternative approach.
I briefly prototyped some code following an alternative set of rules. I think it would work, but I certainly didn't get as far as thinking how it would interact with concepts as complicated as the cache descriptors.
My alternative rules were:
- functions always preserve the logcontext of their caller, whether or not they are returning a Deferred.
- Deferreds returned by synapse functions run their callbacks in the same context as the function was orignally called in.
The main point of this scheme is that everywhere that sets the logcontext is responsible for clearing it before returning control to the reactor.
So, for example, if you were the function which started a
with LoggingContext
block, you wouldn't yield
within it — instead you'd start off the background process, and then
leave the with
block to wait for it:
def handle_request(request_id):
with context.LoggingContext() as request_context:
= request_id
request_context.request = do_request_handling()
d
def cb(r):
"finished")
logger.debug(
d.addCallback(cb)return d
(in general, mixing with LoggingContext
blocks and
defer.inlineCallbacks
in the same function leads to slighly
counter-intuitive code, under this scheme).
Because we leave the original with
block as soon as the
Deferred is returned (as opposed to waiting for it to be resolved, as we
do today), the logcontext is cleared before control passes back to the
reactor; so if there is some code within
do_request_handling
which needs to wait for a Deferred to
complete, there is no need for it to worry about clearing the logcontext
before doing so:
def handle_request():
= do_some_stuff()
r
r.addCallback(do_some_more_stuff)return r
— and provided do_some_stuff
follows the rules of
returning a Deferred which runs its callbacks in the original
logcontext, all is happy.
The business of a Deferred which runs its callbacks in the original
logcontext isn't hard to achieve — we have it today, in the shape of
context._PreservingContextDeferred
:
def do_some_stuff():
= do_some_io()
deferred = _PreservingContextDeferred(LoggingContext.current_context())
pcd
deferred.chainDeferred(pcd)return pcd
It turns out that, thanks to the way that Deferreds chain together,
we automatically get the property of a context-preserving deferred with
defer.inlineCallbacks
, provided the final Defered the
function yields
on has that property. So we can just
write:
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def handle_request():
yield do_some_stuff()
yield do_some_more_stuff()
To conclude: I think this scheme would have worked equally well, with less danger of messing it up, and probably made some more esoteric code easier to write. But again — changing the conventions of the entire Synapse codebase is not a sensible option for the marginal improvement offered.
A note on garbage-collection of Deferred chains
It turns out that our logcontext rules do not play nicely with Deferred chains which get orphaned and garbage-collected.
Imagine we have some code that looks like this:
= []
listener_queue
def on_something_interesting():
for d in listener_queue:
"foo")
d.callback(
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def await_something_interesting():
= defer.Deferred()
new_deferred
listener_queue.append(new_deferred)
with PreserveLoggingContext():
yield new_deferred
Obviously, the idea here is that we have a bunch of things which are waiting for an event. (It's just an example of the problem here, but a relatively common one.)
Now let's imagine two further things happen. First of all, whatever was waiting for the interesting thing goes away. (Perhaps the request times out, or something even more interesting happens.)
Secondly, let's suppose that we decide that the interesting thing is never going to happen, and we reset the listener queue:
def reset_listener_queue():
listener_queue.clear()
So, both ends of the deferred chain have now dropped their
references, and the deferred chain is now orphaned, and will be
garbage-collected at some point. Note that
await_something_interesting
is a generator function, and
when Python garbage-collects generator functions, it gives them a chance
to clean up by making the yield
raise a
GeneratorExit
exception. In our case, that means that the
__exit__
handler of PreserveLoggingContext
will carefully restore the request context, but there is now nothing
waiting for its return, so the request context is never cleared.
To reiterate, this problem only arises when both ends of a deferred chain are dropped. Dropping the the reference to a deferred you're supposed to be calling is probably bad practice, so this doesn't actually happen too much. Unfortunately, when it does happen, it will lead to leaked logcontexts which are incredibly hard to track down.