this could happen very rarely when clicking very fast to accept the call before the conversation was set.
Exception java.lang.NullPointerException:
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallNotificationActivity.proceedToCall (CallNotificationActivity.kt:156)
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallNotificationActivity.initClickListeners$lambda$0 (CallNotificationActivity.kt:126)
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallNotificationActivity.$r8$lambda$0cnB_UmYcTD4PyxIBSZCZs1m_6s
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallNotificationActivity$$ExternalSyntheticLambda0.onClick
at android.view.View.performClick (View.java:6612)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal (View.java:6581)
at android.view.View.access$3100 (View.java:785)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run (View.java:25904)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:873)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:280)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:6706)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:493)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:858)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
Exception java.lang.NullPointerException:
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallActivity.hangupNetworkCalls (CallActivity.java:1749)
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallActivity.hangup (CallActivity.java:1741)
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallActivity.lambda$initClickListeners$8$com-nextcloud-talk-activities-CallActivity (CallActivity.java:465)
at com.nextcloud.talk.activities.CallActivity$$ExternalSyntheticLambda16.onClick
at android.view.View.performClick (View.java:7792)
at android.view.View.performClickInternal (View.java:7769)
at android.view.View.access$3800 (View.java:910)
at android.view.View$PerformClick.run (View.java:30218)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:938)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99)
at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:226)
at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:313)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8751)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:571)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1135)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
When the HPB is not used and a PeerConnectionWrapper is created it
always sent an offer if the local session ID is higher than the remote
session ID. However, in the case of screen shares the participant
sharing the screen always sends an offer, no matter the session ID.
Therefore, when that offer was received the new PeerConnectionWrapper
object sent a new offer, which in turn created an extra connection in
the browser.
Although the screen share connection happens to work the underlying
behaviour was wrong, so now no offer is sent for received screen share
connections and it is always waited until the offer is sent by the other
participant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
logic for setting the placeholder was moved to getPayloadForImageLoader.
This is a better solution than in commit
9557bec9 where the onBind method had to be called in between other code.
This is still not the best solution because getPayloadForImageLoader now contains more logic than it should (which is also not only responsible for the placeholder). Anyway as this is a hotfix it's the best solution for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
follow up to commit 7464e6994b673d2b575903a76752bf39bed9d622
the problem was that the "super" methods also contain logic to show/hide the avatar. So this result must be overwritten again after calling the super method.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
without this fix, "getPayloadForImageLoader" was called before the placeholder was set (so it was null until getPayloadForImageLoader was called again after ~30seconds.). This is fixed by calling the super method at the end of "onBind".
min height was set to avoid very tiny previews (like for the placeholders)
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
since null checks are done for the nullable bindings by PR #2694, the try-catch blocks arent necessary anymore.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
it seems async calls are not cancelled reliable so it was decided to always check for null bindings to avoid NPEs
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <dev@mhibbe.de>
The peer connections will be of either "video" or "screen" type, so they
can be simply removed based on the session id and an explicit type.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of trying to create a video peer connection for any joined
participant now only a call participant is created for any joined
participant, and a video peer connection is created only for those
participants that are publishing audio or video.
If a call participants does not have a video peer connection the call
participant is now seen as "connected" from the UI, as there is no need
to show a progress bar for that participant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
As CallParticipantList starts listening on the signaling messages as
soon as it is created it needs to be created and destroyed right before
entering and exiting a call. Otherwise it could receive messages on
other states (for example, while the "connection timeout" message is
shown) and thus once the local participant joined the event would not
include the other participants already in the call as joined (although
they would be anyway reported as unchanged).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
For now only the same signaling messages that were already handled are
still handled; in the future it could be extended to handle other
messages, like the one sent by the external signaling server when a
participant leaves the room (in some cases no participants update
message is sent if the participant leaves the call and room at the same
time, which causes the participants to still be seen as in call until a
new update is received).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The observers were created for any peer connection, but after recent
changes they ignored all changes but those from the self peer
connection. Therefore it is enough to just add an explicit listener on
that peer connection rather than on all of them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The connection state changes to "closed" only when the connection is
closed. However, closing a connection does not fire any event (not even
the "iceConnectionStateChanged" event), so the event handler can be
removed as it will never be executed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The ParticipantDisplayItems were created and destroyed based on the peer
connections. Now a ParticipantDisplayItem of "video" type is associated
to a call participant, while an additional item is created and destroyed
depending on the state of the screen peer connection of the call
participant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The listeners for call participant messages and for the call participant
nick provided by offers / answers were created and destroyed based on
the peer connections, although they were implicitly associated to a call
participant. Now they are explicitly created and destroyed based on its
associated call participant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
CallParticipant provides a read-only CallParticipantModel and internally
handles the data channel and peer connection events that modify the
model. Nevertheless, the CallParticipant requires certain properties to
be externally set, like the userId or the peer connections.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of explicitly setting the values on the ParticipantDisplayItems
now the values are set on the CallParticipantModels, and the items are
automatically updated from their model when they change.
Different items are still used for the audio/video and screen shares of
the same participant, so the type is used to select from which
properties of the model is the item updated.
As the model may be updated from background threads it is explicitly
observed by the items from the main thread using a Handler shared by all
the items.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
