Otherwise a interrupted or unsuccessful download would mean that the
download-intend was forgotten. The next sync would reestablish the
virtual file instead.
Also, if there is too-new configuration, backup the file, show a
warning message asking the user whether it's ok to discard the
configuration from the future.
See #6504
Issue #6420
Store the X-Request-ID in the SyncFileItem and also in the blacklist.
Note that for consistency reason, the X-Request-ID is also in the
SyncFileItem if the request succeeds.
Currently there is no UI to access it, but it can be queried with sql
commands
Similar to the use for the checksum.
I know that zlib is required in principle, but i don't have it
in one of my test building environment, and it is easier to just
disable it.
From issue #7015, the code is wrong because the path is the file system path and
not the path on the DB.
But since this is a conflict, this means the reconcile will still want to download
the file from the server next sync, so we need not to worry about this case
To do this, we add the placeholder extension to the user exclude file
automatically. However, newer clients shouldn't use that exclude
pattern: so we also add version directives that allow making exclude
patterns dependent on the client version.
Now the db entries for placeholders will have the full placeholder
paths. That way older clients will, on remote discovery, delete the
placeholders and download the real files.
- Controled by an option.
- New remote files start out as ItemTypePlaceholder, are created with a
.owncloud extension.
- When their db entry is set to ItemTypePlaceholderDownload the next
sync run will download them.
- Files that aren't in the placeholder state sync as usual.
- See test cases in testsyncplaceholders.
Missing:
- User ui for triggering placeholder file download
- Maybe: Going back from file to placeholder?
You'd expect that after a conflict resolution the file watcher would
pick up the change and trigger a sync. For some reason it doesn't seem
to happen on at least some Ubuntu systems. In such cases the user would
then still have a stale conflict entry in the activity list and wouldn't
be able to do anything with it.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ottens <kevin.ottens@nextcloud.com>
The model was just checking for the user list being empty or not which
is overly optimistic. Indeed there might be cases where the id is
actually outside the boundaries so properly check for this.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ottens <kevin.ottens@nextcloud.com>
