mirror of
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse.git
synced 2024-12-21 03:42:55 +03:00
606da398fc
We can only fetch room types for rooms the server is in, so we need to only filter rooms that we're joined to. Also includes a perf fix to bulk fetch room types.
3076 lines
120 KiB
Python
3076 lines
120 KiB
Python
#
|
|
# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
|
|
#
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
|
|
# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
|
|
# License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
#
|
|
# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
|
|
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
|
|
#
|
|
# Originally licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0:
|
|
# <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>.
|
|
#
|
|
# [This file includes modifications made by New Vector Limited]
|
|
#
|
|
#
|
|
import logging
|
|
from copy import deepcopy
|
|
from typing import Optional
|
|
from unittest.mock import patch
|
|
|
|
from parameterized import parameterized
|
|
|
|
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
|
|
|
|
from synapse.api.constants import (
|
|
AccountDataTypes,
|
|
EventContentFields,
|
|
EventTypes,
|
|
JoinRules,
|
|
Membership,
|
|
RoomTypes,
|
|
)
|
|
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
|
|
from synapse.events import make_event_from_dict
|
|
from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
|
|
from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import RoomSyncConfig, StateValues
|
|
from synapse.rest import admin
|
|
from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
|
|
from synapse.server import HomeServer
|
|
from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
|
|
from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID
|
|
from synapse.types.handlers import SlidingSyncConfig
|
|
from synapse.util import Clock
|
|
|
|
from tests.replication._base import BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase
|
|
from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, TestCase
|
|
|
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class RoomSyncConfigTestCase(TestCase):
|
|
def _assert_room_config_equal(
|
|
self,
|
|
actual: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
message_prefix: Optional[str] = None,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
self.assertEqual(actual.timeline_limit, expected.timeline_limit, message_prefix)
|
|
|
|
# `self.assertEqual(...)` works fine to catch differences but the output is
|
|
# almost impossible to read because of the way it truncates the output and the
|
|
# order doesn't actually matter.
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
actual.required_state_map, expected.required_state_map, message_prefix
|
|
)
|
|
for event_type, expected_state_keys in expected.required_state_map.items():
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
actual.required_state_map[event_type],
|
|
expected_state_keys,
|
|
f"{message_prefix}: Mismatch for {event_type}",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(
|
|
"from_list_config",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList` to a
|
|
`RoomSyncConfig`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"from_room_subscription",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription` to a
|
|
`RoomSyncConfig`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) for both the `event_type` and `state_key` will override
|
|
all other values.
|
|
|
|
Note: MSC3575 describes different behavior to how we're handling things here but
|
|
since it's not wrong to return more state than requested (`required_state` is
|
|
just the minimum requested), it doesn't matter if we include things that the
|
|
client wanted excluded. This complexity is also under scrutiny, see
|
|
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575#discussion_r1185109050
|
|
|
|
> One unique exception is when you request all state events via ["*", "*"]. When used,
|
|
> all state events are returned by default, and additional entries FILTER OUT the returned set
|
|
> of state events. These additional entries cannot use '*' themselves.
|
|
> For example, ["*", "*"], ["m.room.member", "@alice:example.com"] will _exclude_ every m.room.member
|
|
> event _except_ for @alice:example.com, and include every other state event.
|
|
> In addition, ["*", "*"], ["m.space.child", "*"] is an error, the m.space.child filter is not
|
|
> required as it would have been returned anyway.
|
|
>
|
|
> -- MSC3575 (https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575)
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_type",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values for the
|
|
same `state_key`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"multiple_wildcard_type",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values
|
|
for the same `state_key`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, "@foo"),
|
|
("org.matrix.personal_count", "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_state_key",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `state_key` will override all other values for the
|
|
same `event_type`.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD,
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_merge",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a wildcard (*) entries for the `event_type` and another one for
|
|
`state_key` will play together.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_merge2",
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that an all wildcard ("*", "*") entry will override any other
|
|
values (including other wildcards).
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
# One of these should take precedence over everything else
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"lazy_members",
|
|
"""
|
|
`$LAZY` room members should just be another additional key next to other
|
|
explicit keys. We will unroll the special `$LAZY` meaning later.
|
|
""",
|
|
# Input
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state=[
|
|
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
|
|
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
|
|
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
|
|
],
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_from_room_config(
|
|
self,
|
|
_test_label: str,
|
|
_test_description: str,
|
|
room_params: SlidingSyncConfig.CommonRoomParameters,
|
|
expected_room_sync_config: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)` will result in the `expected_room_sync_config`.
|
|
"""
|
|
room_sync_config = RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(
|
|
room_sync_config,
|
|
expected_room_sync_config,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(
|
|
"no_direct_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Name: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
StateValues.LAZY,
|
|
"@baz",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"@bar"},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_type_wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {
|
|
"dummy",
|
|
"dummy2",
|
|
},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
"@bar",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_key_wildcard_overlap",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {"tulips"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
"state_type_and_state_key_wildcard_merge",
|
|
# A
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# B
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=9,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
# Expected
|
|
RoomSyncConfig(
|
|
timeline_limit=10,
|
|
required_state_map={
|
|
EventTypes.Dummy: {
|
|
"dummy",
|
|
"dummy2",
|
|
},
|
|
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
|
|
"",
|
|
"@foo",
|
|
},
|
|
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_combine_room_sync_config(
|
|
self,
|
|
_test_label: str,
|
|
a: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
b: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Combine A into B and B into A to make sure we get the same result.
|
|
"""
|
|
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
|
|
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
|
|
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
|
|
|
|
# Combine B into A
|
|
room_sync_config_a.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_b)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_a, expected, "B into A")
|
|
|
|
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
|
|
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
|
|
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
|
|
|
|
# Combine A into B
|
|
room_sync_config_b.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_a)
|
|
|
|
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_b, expected, "A into B")
|
|
|
|
|
|
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it returns
|
|
the correct list of rooms IDs.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
|
|
|
|
def test_no_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test when the user has never joined any rooms before
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
# user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=now_token,
|
|
to_token=now_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_get_newly_joined_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user has newly_joined show up. newly_joined is when you
|
|
join after the `from_token` and <= `to_token`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
|
|
# from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because we joined during the token
|
|
# range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user is already joined show up.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
|
|
# from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that rooms that the user is invited to, banned from, and knocked on show
|
|
up.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Setup the invited room (user2 invites user1 to the room)
|
|
invited_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
|
|
invited_room_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
|
|
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
ban_response = self.helper.ban(
|
|
ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the knock room (user1 knocks on the room)
|
|
knock_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=RoomVersions.V7.identifier
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
knock_room_id,
|
|
EventTypes.JoinRules,
|
|
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
# User1 knocks on the room
|
|
knock_channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
"/_matrix/client/r0/knock/%s" % (knock_room_id,),
|
|
b"{}",
|
|
user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(knock_channel.code, 200, knock_channel.result)
|
|
knock_room_membership_state_event = self.get_success(
|
|
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state_event(
|
|
knock_room_id, EventTypes.Member, user1_id
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
assert knock_room_membership_state_event is not None
|
|
|
|
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
invited_room_id,
|
|
ban_room_id,
|
|
knock_room_id,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
# It should be pointing to the the respective membership event (latest
|
|
# membership event in the from/to range)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[invited_room_id].event_id,
|
|
invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[ban_room_id].event_id,
|
|
ban_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[knock_room_id].event_id,
|
|
knock_room_membership_state_event.event_id,
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
|
|
# of the `to_token`.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a room that the user was kicked from still shows up. When the user
|
|
comes back to their client, they should see that they were kicked.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
to_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# The kicked room should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
|
|
kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
|
|
# of the `to_token`.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Forgotten rooms do not show up even if we forget after the from/to range.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, we would be able to track when the `/forget` happens and apply it
|
|
accordingly in the token range but the forgotten flag is only an extra bool in
|
|
the `room_memberships` table.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup a normal room that we leave. This won't show up in the sync response
|
|
# because we left it before our token but is good to check anyway.
|
|
leave_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
|
|
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.ban(ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
before_room_forgets = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Forget the room after we already have our tokens. This doesn't change
|
|
# the membership event itself but will mark it internally in Synapse
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{leave_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{ban_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
channel = self.make_request(
|
|
"POST",
|
|
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{kick_room_id}/forget",
|
|
content={},
|
|
access_token=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room_forgets,
|
|
to_token=before_room_forgets,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that newly_left rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
|
|
were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
|
|
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
_leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room2_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only the newly_left room should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range but
|
|
# the `event_id` is `None` because we left the room causing the server to leave
|
|
# the room because no other local users are in it (quirk of the
|
|
# `current_state_delta_stream` table that we source things from)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
|
|
None, # _leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are instead `newly_left`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Rooms we join after the `to_token` should *not* show up. See condition "1b)"
|
|
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Room join after our `to_token` shouldn't show up
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined during the
|
|
from_token/to_token. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We should still see the room because we were joined during the
|
|
# from_token/to_token time period.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined before the `from_token`
|
|
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We should still see the room because we were joined before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Room still shows up if we left the room but were kicked before the `from_token`
|
|
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
|
|
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
|
|
)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Kick user1 from the room
|
|
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
|
|
room=kick_room_id,
|
|
src=user2_id,
|
|
targ=user1_id,
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
|
|
extra_data={
|
|
"reason": "Bad manners",
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
#
|
|
# We have to join before we can leave (leave -> leave isn't a valid transition
|
|
# or at least it doesn't work in Synapse, 403 forbidden)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
to_token=after_kick_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
|
|
kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"kick_response": kick_response["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were kicked
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
|
|
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1a)"
|
|
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1b)" comments
|
|
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we we're
|
|
joined up to the `to_token`.
|
|
|
|
Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it adds `newly_left`
|
|
rooms to the response.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Join room1
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room2 before the `to_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room2 after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because there is no `from_token` to
|
|
# define a "live" range to compare against
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test when the provided `from_token` comes after the `to_token`. We should
|
|
basically expect the same result as having no `from_token`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id4 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Join room1 before `before_room_token`
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room2 before `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after
|
|
# the `to_token` in this test
|
|
to_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join room2 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# --------
|
|
|
|
# Join room3 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room4 after `before_room_token`
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after the
|
|
# `to_token` in this test
|
|
from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room4 after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=from_token,
|
|
to_token=to_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
|
|
#
|
|
# There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
|
|
# `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined `room1` before either of the tokens
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
|
|
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments
|
|
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
|
|
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Join and leave multiple times shouldn't affect rooms from showing up. It just
|
|
matters that we were joined or newly_left in the from/to range. But we're also
|
|
testing that joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the
|
|
results.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Join and leave multiple times before the from/to range shouldn't affect rooms
|
|
from showing up. It just matters that we were joined or newly_left in the
|
|
from/to range. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
|
|
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
|
|
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Make it look like we joined after the token range but we were invited before the
|
|
from/to range so the room should still show up. See condition "1a)" comments in
|
|
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Invited to the room before the token
|
|
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
|
|
room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
join_respsonse = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"invite_response": invite_response["event_id"],
|
|
"join_respsonse": join_respsonse["event_id"],
|
|
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were only invited before the
|
|
# token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_join_and_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
|
|
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there is `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_change1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_change1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_before_and_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event even though there are no
|
|
membership events in the from/range but there are `displayname`/`avatar_url`
|
|
changes before/after the token range.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname before the token range
|
|
displayname_change_before_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_before_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_before_token_range_response": displayname_change_before_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_leave_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
|
|
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
|
|
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates and we leave after the `to_token`.
|
|
|
|
See condition "1a)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Leave after the token
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_display_name_changes_join_after_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple `join` membership events (after the `to_token`) in a row
|
|
indicating `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates doesn't affect the results (we
|
|
joined after the token range so it shouldn't show up)
|
|
|
|
See condition "1b)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname after the token range
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room shouldn't show up because we joined after the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_joined_with_leave_join_in_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that even though we're joined before the token range, if we leave and join
|
|
within the token range, it's still counted as `newly_joined`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Leave and join back during the token range
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_more_changes_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_more_changes_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
join_response2["event_id"],
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because there is some non-join event in
|
|
# between our latest join event.
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_newly_joined_only_joins_during_token_range(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that a join and more joins caused by display name changes, all during the
|
|
token range, still count as `newly_joined`.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response1 = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2 = self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
|
|
state_key=user1_id,
|
|
body={
|
|
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
|
|
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room1_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room1_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
|
|
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
|
|
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2["event_id"],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response1": displayname_change_during_token_range_response1[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response2": displayname_change_during_token_range_response2[
|
|
"event_id"
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
# We should be `newly_joined` because we first joined during the token range
|
|
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
|
|
|
|
def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
|
|
self,
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that multiple rooms are not confused as we fixup the list. This test is
|
|
spawning from a real world bug in the code where I was accidentally using
|
|
`event.room_id` in one of the fix-up loops but the `event` being referenced was
|
|
actually from a different loop.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
|
|
# leave and can still re-join.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Invited and left the room before the token
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Invited to room2
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
before_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Invited and left room3 during the from/to range
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id3, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room2
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room3
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_room3_token,
|
|
to_token=after_room3_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
# `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
|
|
#
|
|
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
|
|
room_id2,
|
|
# Room should show up because it was newly_left during the from/to range
|
|
room_id3,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it works with
|
|
sharded event stream_writers enabled
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets_for_client_rest_resource,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> dict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
|
|
# Enable shared event stream_writers
|
|
config["stream_writers"] = {"events": ["worker1", "worker2", "worker3"]}
|
|
config["instance_map"] = {
|
|
"main": {"host": "testserv", "port": 8765},
|
|
"worker1": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1001},
|
|
"worker2": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1002},
|
|
"worker3": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1003},
|
|
}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def _create_room(self, room_id: str, user_id: str, tok: str) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Create a room with a specific room_id. We use this so that that we have a
|
|
consistent room_id across test runs that hashes to the same value and will be
|
|
sharded to a known worker in the tests.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# We control the room ID generation by patching out the
|
|
# `_generate_room_id` method
|
|
with patch(
|
|
"synapse.handlers.room.RoomCreationHandler._generate_room_id"
|
|
) as mock:
|
|
mock.side_effect = lambda: room_id
|
|
self.helper.create_room_as(user_id, tok=tok)
|
|
|
|
def test_sharded_event_persisters(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
This test should catch bugs that would come from flawed stream position
|
|
(`stream_ordering`) comparisons or making `RoomStreamToken`'s naively. To
|
|
compare event positions properly, you need to consider both the `instance_name`
|
|
and `stream_ordering` together.
|
|
|
|
The test creates three event persister workers and a room that is sharded to
|
|
each worker. On worker2, we make the event stream position stuck so that it lags
|
|
behind the other workers and we start getting `RoomStreamToken` that have an
|
|
`instance_map` component (i.e. q`m{min_pos}~{writer1}.{pos1}~{writer2}.{pos2}`).
|
|
|
|
We then send some events to advance the stream positions of worker1 and worker3
|
|
but worker2 is lagging behind because it's stuck. We are specifically testing
|
|
that `get_sync_room_ids_for_user(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
|
|
correctly in these adverse conditions.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker1"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
worker_hs2 = self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker2"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.make_worker_hs(
|
|
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
|
|
{"worker_name": "worker3"},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Specially crafted room IDs that get persisted on different workers.
|
|
#
|
|
# Sharded to worker1
|
|
room_id1 = "!fooo:test"
|
|
# Sharded to worker2
|
|
room_id2 = "!bar:test"
|
|
# Sharded to worker3
|
|
room_id3 = "!quux:test"
|
|
|
|
# Create rooms on the different workers.
|
|
self._create_room(room_id1, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
self._create_room(room_id2, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
self._create_room(room_id3, user2_id, user2_tok)
|
|
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room2
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# Leave room3
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Ensure that the events were sharded to different workers.
|
|
pos1 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response1["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos1.instance_name, "worker1")
|
|
pos2 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response2["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos2.instance_name, "worker2")
|
|
pos3 = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response3["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pos3.instance_name, "worker3")
|
|
|
|
before_stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# We now gut wrench into the events stream `MultiWriterIdGenerator` on worker2 to
|
|
# mimic it getting stuck persisting an event. This ensures that when we send an
|
|
# event on worker1/worker3 we end up in a state where worker2 events stream
|
|
# position lags that on worker1/worker3, resulting in a RoomStreamToken with a
|
|
# non-empty `instance_map` component.
|
|
#
|
|
# Worker2's event stream position will not advance until we call `__aexit__`
|
|
# again.
|
|
worker_store2 = worker_hs2.get_datastores().main
|
|
assert isinstance(worker_store2._stream_id_gen, MultiWriterIdGenerator)
|
|
actx = worker_store2._stream_id_gen.get_next()
|
|
self.get_success(actx.__aenter__())
|
|
|
|
# For room_id1/worker1: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
|
|
# and generate membership changes.
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# For room_id2/worker2: which is currently stuck, join the room.
|
|
join_on_worker2_response = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
# For room_id3/worker3: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
|
|
# and generate membership changes.
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
join_on_worker3_response = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Get a token while things are stuck after our activity
|
|
stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
# Let's make sure we're working with a token that has an `instance_map`
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(len(stuck_activity_token.room_key.instance_map), 0)
|
|
|
|
# Just double check that the join event on worker2 (that is stuck) happened
|
|
# after the position recorded for worker2 in the token but before the max
|
|
# position in the token. This is crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker2_response["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
# Ensure the join technially came after our token
|
|
self.assertGreater(
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker2"),
|
|
)
|
|
# But less than the max stream position of some other worker
|
|
self.assertLess(
|
|
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
|
|
# max
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_max_stream_pos(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Just double check that the join event on worker3 happened after the min stream
|
|
# value in the token but still within the position recorded for worker3. This is
|
|
# crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos = self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker3_response["event_id"])
|
|
)
|
|
# Ensure the join came after the min but still encapsulated by the token
|
|
self.assertGreaterEqual(
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
|
|
# min
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.stream,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertLessEqual(
|
|
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
|
|
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker3"),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# We finish the fake persisting an event we started above and advance worker2's
|
|
# event stream position (unstuck worker2).
|
|
self.get_success(actx.__aexit__(None, None, None))
|
|
|
|
# The function under test
|
|
room_id_results = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_stuck_activity_token,
|
|
to_token=stuck_activity_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
room_id_results.keys(),
|
|
{
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
# room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
|
|
# and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was stuck.
|
|
# This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
|
|
# `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2
|
|
# wasn't advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the
|
|
# join technically comes after `stuck_activity_token``.
|
|
#
|
|
# room_id2,
|
|
room_id3,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `filter_rooms()` to make sure it includes/excludes rooms
|
|
correctly.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def _create_dm_room(
|
|
self,
|
|
inviter_user_id: str,
|
|
inviter_tok: str,
|
|
invitee_user_id: str,
|
|
invitee_tok: str,
|
|
) -> str:
|
|
"""
|
|
Helper to create a DM room as the "inviter" and invite the "invitee" user to the room. The
|
|
"invitee" user also will join the room. The `m.direct` account data will be set
|
|
for both users.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
# Create a room and send an invite the other user
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
inviter_user_id,
|
|
is_public=False,
|
|
tok=inviter_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.invite(
|
|
room_id,
|
|
src=inviter_user_id,
|
|
targ=invitee_user_id,
|
|
tok=inviter_tok,
|
|
extra_data={"is_direct": True},
|
|
)
|
|
# Person that was invited joins the room
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id, invitee_user_id, tok=invitee_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Mimic the client setting the room as a direct message in the global account
|
|
# data
|
|
self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
|
|
invitee_user_id,
|
|
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
|
|
{inviter_user_id: [room_id]},
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
|
|
inviter_user_id,
|
|
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
|
|
{invitee_user_id: [room_id]},
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return room_id
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_dm_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_dm` for DM rooms
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a DM room
|
|
dm_room_id = self._create_dm_room(
|
|
inviter_user_id=user1_id,
|
|
inviter_tok=user1_tok,
|
|
invitee_user_id=user2_id,
|
|
invitee_tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_dm=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_dm=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {dm_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_dm=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_dm=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_encrypted_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_encrypted` for encrypted rooms
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create an encrypted room
|
|
encrypted_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
encrypted_room_id,
|
|
EventTypes.RoomEncryption,
|
|
{"algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2"},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_encrypted=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_encrypted=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {encrypted_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_encrypted=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_encrypted=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_invite_rooms(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.is_invite` for rooms that the user has been invited to
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a room that user1 is invited to
|
|
invite_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.invite(invite_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_invite=True`
|
|
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_invite=True,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {invite_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try with `is_invite=False`
|
|
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
is_invite=False,
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_room_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.room_types` for different room types
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room (no room type)
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a space room
|
|
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
|
|
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {
|
|
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try finding only normal rooms
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[None]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding only spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding normal rooms and spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding an arbitrary room type
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=["org.matrix.foobarbaz"]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_not_room_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test `filter.not_room_types` for different room types
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room (no room type)
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Create a space room
|
|
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
|
|
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
"creation_content": {
|
|
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(not_room_types=[None]),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id, foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
not_room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms or spaces
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
not_room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
|
|
|
|
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
|
|
# `not_room_types` should win.
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None], not_room_types=[None]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Nothing matches because nothing is both a normal room and not a normal room
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), set())
|
|
|
|
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
|
|
# `not_room_types` should win.
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE], not_room_types=[None]
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
|
|
|
|
def test_filter_room_types_with_invite_remote_room(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Test that we can apply a room type filter, even if we have an invite
|
|
for a remote room.
|
|
|
|
This is a regression test.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
# Create a fake remote invite and persist it.
|
|
invite_room_id = "!some:room"
|
|
invite_event = make_event_from_dict(
|
|
{
|
|
"room_id": invite_room_id,
|
|
"sender": "@user:test.serv",
|
|
"state_key": user1_id,
|
|
"depth": 1,
|
|
"origin_server_ts": 1,
|
|
"type": EventTypes.Member,
|
|
"content": {"membership": Membership.INVITE},
|
|
"auth_events": [],
|
|
"prev_events": [],
|
|
},
|
|
room_version=RoomVersions.V10,
|
|
)
|
|
invite_event.internal_metadata.outlier = True
|
|
invite_event.internal_metadata.out_of_band_membership = True
|
|
|
|
self.get_success(
|
|
self.store.maybe_store_room_on_outlier_membership(
|
|
room_id=invite_room_id, room_version=invite_event.room_version
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
context = EventContext.for_outlier(self.hs.get_storage_controllers())
|
|
persist_controller = self.hs.get_storage_controllers().persistence
|
|
assert persist_controller is not None
|
|
self.get_success(persist_controller.persist_event(invite_event, context))
|
|
|
|
# Create a normal room (no room type)
|
|
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
sync_room_map,
|
|
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
|
|
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE],
|
|
),
|
|
after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, invite_room_id})
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests Sliding Sync handler `sort_rooms()` to make sure it sorts/orders rooms
|
|
correctly.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
admin.register_servlets,
|
|
knock.register_servlets,
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
|
|
config = super().default_config()
|
|
# Enable sliding sync
|
|
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
|
|
return config
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
|
|
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
|
|
|
|
def test_sort_activity_basic(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Rooms with newer activity are sorted first.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
[room_id2, room_id1],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand(
|
|
[
|
|
(Membership.LEAVE,),
|
|
(Membership.INVITE,),
|
|
(Membership.KNOCK,),
|
|
(Membership.BAN,),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
def test_activity_after_xxx(self, room1_membership: str) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
When someone has left/been invited/knocked/been banned from a room, they
|
|
shouldn't take anything into account after that membership event.
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
before_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Create the rooms as user2 so we can have user1 with a clean slate to work from
|
|
# and join in whatever order we need for the tests.
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
# If we're testing knocks, set the room to knock
|
|
if room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
|
|
self.helper.send_state(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
EventTypes.JoinRules,
|
|
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
|
|
|
|
# Here is the activity with user1 that will determine the sort of the rooms
|
|
# (room2, room1, room3)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
if room1_membership == Membership.LEAVE:
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.INVITE:
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
|
|
self.helper.knock(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
elif room1_membership == Membership.BAN:
|
|
self.helper.ban(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Activity before the token but the user is only been xxx to this room so it
|
|
# shouldn't be taken into account
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Activity after the token. Just make it in a different order than what we
|
|
# expect to make sure we're not taking the activity after the token into
|
|
# account.
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id2, "activity in room2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=before_rooms_token,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
[room_id2, room_id1, room_id3],
|
|
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque room IDs: "
|
|
+ str(
|
|
{
|
|
"room_id1": room_id1,
|
|
"room_id2": room_id2,
|
|
"room_id3": room_id3,
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_default_bump_event_types(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Test that we only consider the *latest* event in the room when sorting (not
|
|
`bump_event_types`).
|
|
"""
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
message_response = self.helper.send(room_id1, "message in room1", tok=user1_tok)
|
|
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
user1_id,
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id2, "message in room2", tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
# Send a reaction in room1 which isn't in `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` but we only
|
|
# care about sorting by the *latest* event in the room.
|
|
self.helper.send_event(
|
|
room_id1,
|
|
type=EventTypes.Reaction,
|
|
content={
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
"event_id": message_response["event_id"],
|
|
"key": "👍",
|
|
"rel_type": "m.annotation",
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
tok=user1_tok,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
|
|
|
|
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
|
|
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
|
|
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
|
|
from_token=None,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
|
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
|
|
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
|
|
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
|
|
to_token=after_rooms_token,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
|
|
# room1 sorts before room2 because it has the latest event (the reaction).
|
|
# We only care about the *latest* event in the room.
|
|
[room_id1, room_id2],
|
|
)
|