Correctly changes to required state config in sliding sync (#17785)

Fixes https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17698

This handles `required_state` changes by checking if new state has been
added to the config, and if so fetching and returning that from the
current state.

This also takes care to ensure that given a state entry S that is added,
removed and then re-added that we do *not* send S down a second time if
there have been no changes to S in the current state. This is fine for
Rust SDK (as it just remembers all state), but we might decide not to do
this behaviour in the MSC. If we decide to always send down S then its
easy enough to rip out all the code.

---------

Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Erik Johnston 2024-10-14 13:31:22 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent ae6179b382
commit d025b5ab50
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
7 changed files with 1188 additions and 14 deletions

1
changelog.d/17785.bugfix Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Fix bug with sliding sync where the server would not return state that was added to the `required_state` config.

1
changelog.d/17805.bugfix Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Fix bug with sliding sync where the server would not return state that was added to the `required_state` config.

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
import logging
from itertools import chain
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Set, Tuple
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, AbstractSet, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Set, Tuple
from prometheus_client import Histogram
from typing_extensions import assert_never
@ -522,6 +522,8 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
state_reset_out_of_room = True
prev_room_sync_config = previous_connection_state.room_configs.get(room_id)
# Determine whether we should limit the timeline to the token range.
#
# We should return historical messages (before token range) in the
@ -550,7 +552,6 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
# or `limited` mean for clients that interpret them correctly. In future this
# behavior is almost certainly going to change.
#
# TODO: Also handle changes to `required_state`
from_bound = None
initial = True
ignore_timeline_bound = False
@ -571,7 +572,6 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
log_kv({"sliding_sync.room_status": room_status})
prev_room_sync_config = previous_connection_state.room_configs.get(room_id)
if prev_room_sync_config is not None:
# Check if the timeline limit has increased, if so ignore the
# timeline bound and record the change (see "XXX: Odd behavior"
@ -582,8 +582,6 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
):
ignore_timeline_bound = True
# TODO: Check for changes in `required_state``
log_kv(
{
"sliding_sync.from_bound": from_bound,
@ -997,6 +995,10 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
include_others=required_state_filter.include_others,
)
# The required state map to store in the room sync config, if it has
# changed.
changed_required_state_map: Optional[Mapping[str, AbstractSet[str]]] = None
# We can return all of the state that was requested if this was the first
# time we've sent the room down this connection.
room_state: StateMap[EventBase] = {}
@ -1010,6 +1012,29 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
else:
assert from_bound is not None
if prev_room_sync_config is not None:
# Check if there are any changes to the required state config
# that we need to handle.
changed_required_state_map, added_state_filter = (
_required_state_changes(
user.to_string(),
previous_room_config=prev_room_sync_config,
room_sync_config=room_sync_config,
state_deltas=room_state_delta_id_map,
)
)
if added_state_filter:
# Some state entries got added, so we pull out the current
# state for them. If we don't do this we'd only send down new deltas.
state_ids = await self.get_current_state_ids_at(
room_id=room_id,
room_membership_for_user_at_to_token=room_membership_for_user_at_to_token,
state_filter=added_state_filter,
to_token=to_token,
)
room_state_delta_id_map.update(state_ids)
events = await self.store.get_events(
state_filter.filter_state(room_state_delta_id_map).values()
)
@ -1108,10 +1133,13 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
# sensible order again.
bump_stamp = 0
unstable_expanded_timeline = False
prev_room_sync_config = previous_connection_state.room_configs.get(room_id)
room_sync_required_state_map_to_persist = room_sync_config.required_state_map
if changed_required_state_map:
room_sync_required_state_map_to_persist = changed_required_state_map
# Record the `room_sync_config` if we're `ignore_timeline_bound` (which means
# that the `timeline_limit` has increased)
unstable_expanded_timeline = False
if ignore_timeline_bound:
# FIXME: We signal the fact that we're sending down more events to
# the client by setting `unstable_expanded_timeline` to true (see
@ -1120,7 +1148,7 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
new_connection_state.room_configs[room_id] = RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=room_sync_config.timeline_limit,
required_state_map=room_sync_config.required_state_map,
required_state_map=room_sync_required_state_map_to_persist,
)
elif prev_room_sync_config is not None:
# If the result is `limited` then we need to record that the
@ -1149,10 +1177,14 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
):
new_connection_state.room_configs[room_id] = RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=room_sync_config.timeline_limit,
required_state_map=room_sync_config.required_state_map,
required_state_map=room_sync_required_state_map_to_persist,
)
# TODO: Record changes in required_state.
elif changed_required_state_map is not None:
new_connection_state.room_configs[room_id] = RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=room_sync_config.timeline_limit,
required_state_map=room_sync_required_state_map_to_persist,
)
else:
new_connection_state.room_configs[room_id] = room_sync_config
@ -1285,3 +1317,185 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
return new_bump_event_pos.stream
return None
def _required_state_changes(
user_id: str,
*,
previous_room_config: "RoomSyncConfig",
room_sync_config: RoomSyncConfig,
state_deltas: StateMap[str],
) -> Tuple[Optional[Mapping[str, AbstractSet[str]]], StateFilter]:
"""Calculates the changes between the required state room config from the
previous requests compared with the current request.
This does two things. First, it calculates if we need to update the room
config due to changes to required state. Secondly, it works out which state
entries we need to pull from current state and return due to the state entry
now appearing in the required state when it previously wasn't (on top of the
state deltas).
This function tries to ensure to handle the case where a state entry is
added, removed and then added again to the required state. In that case we
only want to re-send that entry down sync if it has changed.
Returns:
A 2-tuple of updated required state config (or None if there is no update)
and the state filter to use to fetch extra current state that we need to
return.
"""
prev_required_state_map = previous_room_config.required_state_map
request_required_state_map = room_sync_config.required_state_map
if prev_required_state_map == request_required_state_map:
# There has been no change. Return immediately.
return None, StateFilter.none()
prev_wildcard = prev_required_state_map.get(StateValues.WILDCARD, set())
request_wildcard = request_required_state_map.get(StateValues.WILDCARD, set())
# If we were previously fetching everything ("*", "*"), always update the effective
# room required state config to match the request. And since we we're previously
# already fetching everything, we don't have to fetch anything now that they've
# narrowed.
if StateValues.WILDCARD in prev_wildcard:
return request_required_state_map, StateFilter.none()
# If a event type wildcard has been added or removed we don't try and do
# anything fancy, and instead always update the effective room required
# state config to match the request.
if request_wildcard - prev_wildcard:
# Some keys were added, so we need to fetch everything
return request_required_state_map, StateFilter.all()
if prev_wildcard - request_wildcard:
# Keys were only removed, so we don't have to fetch everything.
return request_required_state_map, StateFilter.none()
# Contains updates to the required state map compared with the previous room
# config. This has the same format as `RoomSyncConfig.required_state`
changes: Dict[str, AbstractSet[str]] = {}
# The set of types/state keys that we need to fetch and return to the
# client. Passed to `StateFilter.from_types(...)`
added: List[Tuple[str, Optional[str]]] = []
# First we calculate what, if anything, has been *added*.
for event_type in (
prev_required_state_map.keys() | request_required_state_map.keys()
):
old_state_keys = prev_required_state_map.get(event_type, set())
request_state_keys = request_required_state_map.get(event_type, set())
if old_state_keys == request_state_keys:
# No change to this type
continue
if not request_state_keys - old_state_keys:
# Nothing *added*, so we skip. Removals happen below.
continue
# Always update changes to include the newly added keys
changes[event_type] = request_state_keys
if StateValues.WILDCARD in old_state_keys:
# We were previously fetching everything for this type, so we don't need to
# fetch anything new.
continue
# Record the new state keys to fetch for this type.
if StateValues.WILDCARD in request_state_keys:
# If we have added a wildcard then we always just fetch everything.
added.append((event_type, None))
else:
for state_key in request_state_keys - old_state_keys:
if state_key == StateValues.ME:
added.append((event_type, user_id))
elif state_key == StateValues.LAZY:
# We handle lazy loading separately (outside this function),
# so don't need to explicitly add anything here.
#
# LAZY values should also be ignore for event types that are
# not membership.
pass
else:
added.append((event_type, state_key))
added_state_filter = StateFilter.from_types(added)
# Convert the list of state deltas to map from type to state_keys that have
# changed.
changed_types_to_state_keys: Dict[str, Set[str]] = {}
for event_type, state_key in state_deltas:
changed_types_to_state_keys.setdefault(event_type, set()).add(state_key)
# Figure out what changes we need to apply to the effective required state
# config.
for event_type, changed_state_keys in changed_types_to_state_keys.items():
old_state_keys = prev_required_state_map.get(event_type, set())
request_state_keys = request_required_state_map.get(event_type, set())
if old_state_keys == request_state_keys:
# No change.
continue
if request_state_keys - old_state_keys:
# We've expanded the set of state keys, so we just clobber the
# current set with the new set.
#
# We could also ensure that we keep entries where the state hasn't
# changed, but are no longer in the requested required state, but
# that's a sufficient edge case that we can ignore (as its only a
# performance optimization).
changes[event_type] = request_state_keys
continue
old_state_key_wildcard = StateValues.WILDCARD in old_state_keys
request_state_key_wildcard = StateValues.WILDCARD in request_state_keys
if old_state_key_wildcard != request_state_key_wildcard:
# If a state_key wildcard has been added or removed, we always update the
# effective room required state config to match the request.
changes[event_type] = request_state_keys
continue
if event_type == EventTypes.Member:
old_state_key_lazy = StateValues.LAZY in old_state_keys
request_state_key_lazy = StateValues.LAZY in request_state_keys
if old_state_key_lazy != request_state_key_lazy:
# If a "$LAZY" has been added or removed we always update the effective room
# required state config to match the request.
changes[event_type] = request_state_keys
continue
# Handle "$ME" values by adding "$ME" if the state key matches the user
# ID.
if user_id in changed_state_keys:
changed_state_keys.add(StateValues.ME)
# At this point there are no wildcards and no additions to the set of
# state keys requested, only deletions.
#
# We only remove state keys from the effective state if they've been
# removed from the request *and* the state has changed. This ensures
# that if a client removes and then re-adds a state key, we only send
# down the associated current state event if its changed (rather than
# sending down the same event twice).
invalidated = (old_state_keys - request_state_keys) & changed_state_keys
if invalidated:
changes[event_type] = old_state_keys - invalidated
if changes:
# Update the required state config based on the changes.
new_required_state_map = dict(prev_required_state_map)
for event_type, state_keys in changes.items():
if state_keys:
new_required_state_map[event_type] = state_keys
else:
# Remove entries with empty state keys.
new_required_state_map.pop(event_type, None)
return new_required_state_map, added_state_filter
else:
return None, added_state_filter

View file

@ -386,8 +386,8 @@ class SlidingSyncStore(SQLBaseStore):
required_state_map: Dict[int, Dict[str, Set[str]]] = {}
for row in rows:
state = required_state_map[row[0]] = {}
for event_type, state_keys in db_to_json(row[1]):
state[event_type] = set(state_keys)
for event_type, state_key in db_to_json(row[1]):
state.setdefault(event_type, set()).add(state_key)
# Get all the room configs, looking up the required state from the map
# above.

View file

@ -616,6 +616,13 @@ class StateFilter:
return False
def __bool__(self) -> bool:
"""Returns true if this state filter will match any state, or false if
this is the empty filter"""
if self.include_others:
return True
return bool(self.types)
_ALL_STATE_FILTER = StateFilter(types=immutabledict(), include_others=True)
_ALL_NON_MEMBER_STATE_FILTER = StateFilter(

View file

@ -18,9 +18,10 @@
#
#
import logging
from typing import AbstractSet, Dict, Optional, Tuple
from typing import AbstractSet, Dict, Mapping, Optional, Set, Tuple
from unittest.mock import patch
import attr
from parameterized import parameterized
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
@ -35,15 +36,18 @@ from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import (
RoomsForUserType,
RoomSyncConfig,
StateValues,
_required_state_changes,
)
from synapse.rest import admin
from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
from synapse.types import JsonDict, StreamToken, UserID
from synapse.types import JsonDict, StateMap, StreamToken, UserID
from synapse.types.handlers.sliding_sync import SlidingSyncConfig
from synapse.types.state import StateFilter
from synapse.util import Clock
from tests import unittest
from tests.replication._base import BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase
from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, TestCase
@ -3213,3 +3217,689 @@ class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
# We only care about the *latest* event in the room.
[room_id1, room_id2],
)
@attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True, frozen=True)
class RequiredStateChangesTestParameters:
previous_required_state_map: Dict[str, Set[str]]
request_required_state_map: Dict[str, Set[str]]
state_deltas: StateMap[str]
expected_with_state_deltas: Tuple[
Optional[Mapping[str, AbstractSet[str]]], StateFilter
]
expected_without_state_deltas: Tuple[
Optional[Mapping[str, AbstractSet[str]]], StateFilter
]
class RequiredStateChangesTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test cases for `_required_state_changes`"""
@parameterized.expand(
[
(
"simple_no_change",
"""Test no change to required state""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
# No changes
expected_with_state_deltas=(None, StateFilter.none()),
expected_without_state_deltas=(None, StateFilter.none()),
),
),
(
"simple_add_type",
"""Test adding a type to the config""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
request_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {"state_key"},
},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've added a type so we should persist the changed required state
# config.
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {"state_key"}},
# We should see the new type added
StateFilter.from_types([("type2", "state_key")]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {"state_key"}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type2", "state_key")]),
),
),
),
(
"simple_add_type_from_nothing",
"""Test adding a type to the config when previously requesting nothing""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={},
request_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {"state_key"},
},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've added a type so we should persist the changed required state
# config.
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {"state_key"}},
# We should see the new types added
StateFilter.from_types(
[("type1", "state_key"), ("type2", "state_key")]
),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {"state_key"}},
StateFilter.from_types(
[("type1", "state_key"), ("type2", "state_key")]
),
),
),
),
(
"simple_add_state_key",
"""Test adding a state key to the config""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type": {"state_key1"}},
request_required_state_map={"type": {"state_key1", "state_key2"}},
state_deltas={("type", "state_key2"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've added a key so we should persist the changed required state
# config.
{"type": {"state_key1", "state_key2"}},
# We should see the new state_keys added
StateFilter.from_types([("type", "state_key2")]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type": {"state_key1", "state_key2"}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type", "state_key2")]),
),
),
),
(
"simple_remove_type",
"""
Test removing a type from the config when there are a matching state
delta does cause the persisted required state config to change
Test removing a type from the config when there are no matching state
deltas does *not* cause the persisted required state config to change
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {"state_key"},
},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# Remove `type2` since there's been a change to that state,
# (persist the change to required state). That way next time,
# they request `type2`, we see that we haven't sent it before
# and send the new state. (we should still keep track that we've
# sent `type1` before).
{"type1": {"state_key"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `type2` is no longer requested but since that state hasn't
# changed, nothing should change (we should still keep track
# that we've sent `type2` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"simple_remove_type_to_nothing",
"""
Test removing a type from the config and no longer requesting any state
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {"state_key"},
},
request_required_state_map={},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# Remove `type2` since there's been a change to that state,
# (persist the change to required state). That way next time,
# they request `type2`, we see that we haven't sent it before
# and send the new state. (we should still keep track that we've
# sent `type1` before).
{"type1": {"state_key"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `type2` is no longer requested but since that state hasn't
# changed, nothing should change (we should still keep track
# that we've sent `type2` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"simple_remove_state_key",
"""
Test removing a state_key from the config
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type": {"state_key1", "state_key2"}},
request_required_state_map={"type": {"state_key1"}},
state_deltas={("type", "state_key2"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# Remove `(type, state_key2)` since there's been a change
# to that state (persist the change to required state).
# That way next time, they request `(type, state_key2)`, we see
# that we haven't sent it before and send the new state. (we
# should still keep track that we've sent `(type, state_key1)`
# before).
{"type": {"state_key1"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `(type, state_key2)` is no longer requested but since that
# state hasn't changed, nothing should change (we should still
# keep track that we've sent `(type, state_key1)` and `(type,
# state_key2)` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"type_wildcards_add",
"""
Test adding a wildcard type causes the persisted required state config
to change and we request everything.
If a event type wildcard has been added or removed we don't try and do
anything fancy, and instead always update the effective room required
state config to match the request.
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key2"}},
request_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key2"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key"},
},
state_deltas={
("other_type", "state_key"): "$event_id",
},
# We've added a wildcard, so we persist the change and request everything
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key2"}, StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key"}},
StateFilter.all(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key2"}, StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key"}},
StateFilter.all(),
),
),
),
(
"type_wildcards_remove",
"""
Test removing a wildcard type causes the persisted required state config
to change and request nothing.
If a event type wildcard has been added or removed we don't try and do
anything fancy, and instead always update the effective room required
state config to match the request.
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key2"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key"},
},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key2"}},
state_deltas={
("other_type", "state_key"): "$event_id",
},
# We've removed a type wildcard, so we persist the change but don't request anything
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key2"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key2"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_wildcards_add",
"""Test adding a wildcard state_key""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
request_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
# We've added a wildcard state_key, so we persist the change and
# request all of the state for that type
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type2", None)]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key"}, "type2": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type2", None)]),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_wildcards_remove",
"""Test removing a wildcard state_key""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key"},
"type2": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key"}},
state_deltas={("type2", "state_key"): "$event_id"},
# We've removed a state_key wildcard, so we persist the change and
# request nothing
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"state_key"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
# We've removed a state_key wildcard but there have been no matching
# state changes, so no changes needed, just persist the
# `request_required_state_map` as-is.
expected_without_state_deltas=(
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_remove_some",
"""
Test that removing state keys work when only some of the state keys have
changed
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key1", "state_key2", "state_key3"}
},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"state_key1"}},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key3"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've removed some state keys from the type, but only state_key3 was
# changed so only that one should be removed.
{"type1": {"state_key1", "state_key2"}},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# No changes needed, just persist the
# `request_required_state_map` as-is
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_me_add",
"""
Test adding state keys work when using "$ME"
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {StateValues.ME}},
state_deltas={("type1", "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've added a type so we should persist the changed required state
# config.
{"type1": {StateValues.ME}},
# We should see the new state_keys added
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", "@user:test")]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {StateValues.ME}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", "@user:test")]),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_me_remove",
"""
Test removing state keys work when using "$ME"
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {StateValues.ME}},
request_required_state_map={},
state_deltas={("type1", "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# Remove `type1` since there's been a change to that state,
# (persist the change to required state). That way next time,
# they request `type1`, we see that we haven't sent it before
# and send the new state. (if we were tracking that we sent any
# other state, we should still keep track that).
{},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `type1` is no longer requested but since that state hasn't
# changed, nothing should change (we should still keep track
# that we've sent `type1` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_user_id_add",
"""
Test adding state keys work when using your own user ID
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {"@user:test"}},
state_deltas={("type1", "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# We've added a type so we should persist the changed required state
# config.
{"type1": {"@user:test"}},
# We should see the new state_keys added
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", "@user:test")]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {"@user:test"}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", "@user:test")]),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_me_remove",
"""
Test removing state keys work when using your own user ID
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {"@user:test"}},
request_required_state_map={},
state_deltas={("type1", "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# Remove `type1` since there's been a change to that state,
# (persist the change to required state). That way next time,
# they request `type1`, we see that we haven't sent it before
# and send the new state. (if we were tracking that we sent any
# other state, we should still keep track that).
{},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `type1` is no longer requested but since that state hasn't
# changed, nothing should change (we should still keep track
# that we've sent `type1` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_lazy_add",
"""
Test adding state keys work when using "$LAZY"
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={},
request_required_state_map={EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.LAZY}},
state_deltas={(EventTypes.Member, "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# If a "$LAZY" has been added or removed we always update the
# required state to what was requested for simplicity.
{EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.LAZY}},
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.LAZY}},
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_lazy_remove",
"""
Test removing state keys work when using "$LAZY"
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.LAZY}},
request_required_state_map={},
state_deltas={(EventTypes.Member, "@user:test"): "$event_id"},
expected_with_state_deltas=(
# If a "$LAZY" has been added or removed we always update the
# required state to what was requested for simplicity.
{},
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
# `EventTypes.Member` is no longer requested but since that
# state hasn't changed, nothing should change (we should still
# keep track that we've sent `EventTypes.Member` before).
None,
# We don't need to request anything more if they are requesting
# less state now
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"type_wildcard_with_state_key_wildcard_to_explicit_state_keys",
"""
Test switching from a wildcard ("*", "*") to explicit state keys
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD}
},
request_required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key1", "state_key2", "state_key3"}
},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key1"): "$event_id"},
# If we were previously fetching everything ("*", "*"), always update the effective
# room required state config to match the request. And since we we're previously
# already fetching everything, we don't have to fetch anything now that they've
# narrowed.
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"state_key1",
"state_key2",
"state_key3",
}
},
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"state_key1",
"state_key2",
"state_key3",
}
},
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"type_wildcard_with_explicit_state_keys_to_wildcard_state_key",
"""
Test switching from explicit to wildcard state keys ("*", "*")
""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"state_key1", "state_key2", "state_key3"}
},
request_required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD}
},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key1"): "$event_id"},
# We've added a wildcard, so we persist the change and request everything
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.all(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.all(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_wildcard_to_explicit_state_keys",
"""Test switching from a wildcard to explicit state keys with a concrete type""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={"type1": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
request_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key1", "state_key2", "state_key3"}
},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key1"): "$event_id"},
# If a state_key wildcard has been added or removed, we always
# update the effective room required state config to match the
# request. And since we we're previously already fetching
# everything, we don't have to fetch anything now that they've
# narrowed.
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{
"type1": {
"state_key1",
"state_key2",
"state_key3",
}
},
StateFilter.none(),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{
"type1": {
"state_key1",
"state_key2",
"state_key3",
}
},
StateFilter.none(),
),
),
),
(
"state_key_wildcard_to_explicit_state_keys",
"""Test switching from a wildcard to explicit state keys with a concrete type""",
RequiredStateChangesTestParameters(
previous_required_state_map={
"type1": {"state_key1", "state_key2", "state_key3"}
},
request_required_state_map={"type1": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
state_deltas={("type1", "state_key1"): "$event_id"},
# If a state_key wildcard has been added or removed, we always
# update the effective room required state config to match the
# request. And we need to request all of the state for that type
# because we previously, only sent down a few keys.
expected_with_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", None)]),
),
expected_without_state_deltas=(
{"type1": {StateValues.WILDCARD}},
StateFilter.from_types([("type1", None)]),
),
),
),
]
)
def test_xxx(
self,
_test_label: str,
_test_description: str,
test_parameters: RequiredStateChangesTestParameters,
) -> None:
# Without `state_deltas`
changed_required_state_map, added_state_filter = _required_state_changes(
user_id="@user:test",
previous_room_config=RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=0,
required_state_map=test_parameters.previous_required_state_map,
),
room_sync_config=RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=0,
required_state_map=test_parameters.request_required_state_map,
),
state_deltas={},
)
self.assertEqual(
changed_required_state_map,
test_parameters.expected_without_state_deltas[0],
"changed_required_state_map does not match (without state_deltas)",
)
self.assertEqual(
added_state_filter,
test_parameters.expected_without_state_deltas[1],
"added_state_filter does not match (without state_deltas)",
)
# With `state_deltas`
changed_required_state_map, added_state_filter = _required_state_changes(
user_id="@user:test",
previous_room_config=RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=0,
required_state_map=test_parameters.previous_required_state_map,
),
room_sync_config=RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=0,
required_state_map=test_parameters.request_required_state_map,
),
state_deltas=test_parameters.state_deltas,
)
self.assertEqual(
changed_required_state_map,
test_parameters.expected_with_state_deltas[0],
"changed_required_state_map does not match (with state_deltas)",
)
self.assertEqual(
added_state_filter,
test_parameters.expected_with_state_deltas[1],
"added_state_filter does not match (with state_deltas)",
)

View file

@ -862,3 +862,264 @@ class SlidingSyncRoomsRequiredStateTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
exact=True,
message=f"Expected only fully-stated rooms to show up for test_key={list_key}.",
)
def test_rooms_required_state_expand(self) -> None:
"""Test that when we expand the required state argument we get the
expanded state, and not just the changes to the new expanded."""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a room with a room name.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id, tok=user1_tok, extra_content={"name": "Foo"}
)
# Only request the state event to begin with
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
],
"timeline_limit": 1,
}
}
}
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
state_map = self.get_success(
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state(room_id1)
)
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Create, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to include the room name
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
[EventTypes.Name, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should see the room name, even though there haven't been any
# changes.
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Name, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# We should not see any state changes.
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
self.assertIsNone(response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"))
def test_rooms_required_state_expand_retract_expand(self) -> None:
"""Test that when expanding, retracting and then expanding the required
state, we get the changes that happened."""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a room with a room name.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id, tok=user1_tok, extra_content={"name": "Foo"}
)
# Only request the state event to begin with
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
],
"timeline_limit": 1,
}
}
}
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
state_map = self.get_success(
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state(room_id1)
)
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Create, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to include the room name
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
[EventTypes.Name, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should see the room name, even though there haven't been any
# changes.
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Name, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Update the room name
self.helper.send_state(
room_id1, "m.room.name", {"name": "Bar"}, state_key="", tok=user1_tok
)
# Update the sliding sync requests to exclude the room name again
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should not see the updated room name in state (though it will be in
# the timeline).
self.assertIsNone(response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"))
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to include the room name again
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
[EventTypes.Name, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should see the *new* room name, even though there haven't been any
# changes.
state_map = self.get_success(
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state(room_id1)
)
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Name, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
def test_rooms_required_state_expand_deduplicate(self) -> None:
"""Test that when expanding, retracting and then expanding the required
state, we don't get the state down again if it hasn't changed"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a room with a room name.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id, tok=user1_tok, extra_content={"name": "Foo"}
)
# Only request the state event to begin with
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
],
"timeline_limit": 1,
}
}
}
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
state_map = self.get_success(
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state(room_id1)
)
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Create, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to include the room name
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
[EventTypes.Name, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should see the room name, even though there haven't been any
# changes.
self._assertRequiredStateIncludes(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["required_state"],
{
state_map[(EventTypes.Name, "")],
},
exact=True,
)
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to exclude the room name again
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should not see any state updates
self.assertIsNone(response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"))
# Send a message so the room comes down sync.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "msg", tok=user1_tok)
# Update the sliding sync requests to include the room name again
sync_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["required_state"] = [
[EventTypes.Create, ""],
[EventTypes.Name, ""],
]
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# We should not see the room name again, as we have already sent that
# down.
self.assertIsNone(response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"))