mirror of
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse.git
synced 2024-11-24 18:45:52 +03:00
Sliding Sync: Fix outlier re-persisting causing problems with sliding sync tables (#17635)
Fix outlier re-persisting causing problems with sliding sync tables Follow-up to https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17512 When running on `matrix.org`, we discovered that a remote invite is first persisted as an `outlier` and then re-persisted again where it is de-outliered. The first the time, the `outlier` is persisted with one `stream_ordering` but when persisted again and de-outliered, it is assigned a different `stream_ordering` that won't end up being used. Since we call `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use the `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're working with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will possibly be unused and not make it into the `events` table.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d844afdc29
commit
26f81fb5be
5 changed files with 263 additions and 134 deletions
1
changelog.d/17635.misc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/17635.misc
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Pre-populate room data used in experimental [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) Sliding Sync `/sync` endpoint for quick filtering/sorting.
|
|
@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ class EventContentFields:
|
|||
|
||||
ROOM_NAME: Final = "name"
|
||||
|
||||
MEMBERSHIP: Final = "membership"
|
||||
|
||||
# Used in m.room.guest_access events.
|
||||
GUEST_ACCESS: Final = "guest_access"
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ class SlidingSyncMembershipInfo:
|
|||
sender: str
|
||||
membership_event_id: str
|
||||
membership: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True)
|
||||
class SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos(SlidingSyncMembershipInfo):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipInfo + `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` of the membership
|
||||
event
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
membership_event_stream_ordering: int
|
||||
membership_event_instance_name: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -170,17 +179,6 @@ class SlidingSyncMembershipInfo:
|
|||
@attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True)
|
||||
class SlidingSyncTableChanges:
|
||||
room_id: str
|
||||
# `stream_ordering` of the most recent event being persisted in the room. This doesn't
|
||||
# need to be perfect, we just need *some* answer that points to a real event in the
|
||||
# room in case we are the first ones inserting into the `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`
|
||||
# table because of the `NON NULL` constraint on `event_stream_ordering`. In reality,
|
||||
# `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` is run after
|
||||
# `_update_current_state_txn()` whenever a new event is persisted to update it to the
|
||||
# correct latest value.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This should be *some* value that points to a real event in the room if we are
|
||||
# still joined to the room and some state is changing (`to_insert` or `to_delete`).
|
||||
joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering: Optional[int]
|
||||
# If the row doesn't exist in the `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` table, we need to
|
||||
# fully-insert it which means we also need to include a `bump_stamp` value to use
|
||||
# for the row. This should only be populated when we're trying to fully-insert a
|
||||
|
@ -401,6 +399,9 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
`stream_ordering`).
|
||||
delta_state: Deltas that are going to be used to update the
|
||||
`current_state_events` table. Changes to the current state of the room.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
SlidingSyncTableChanges
|
||||
"""
|
||||
to_insert = delta_state.to_insert
|
||||
to_delete = delta_state.to_delete
|
||||
|
@ -410,7 +411,6 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
if not to_insert and not to_delete:
|
||||
return SlidingSyncTableChanges(
|
||||
room_id=room_id,
|
||||
joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering=None,
|
||||
joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert=None,
|
||||
joined_room_updates={},
|
||||
membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values={},
|
||||
|
@ -469,24 +469,24 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
membership_event_id,
|
||||
user_id,
|
||||
) in membership_event_id_to_user_id_map.items():
|
||||
# We should only be seeing events with `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` assigned by this point
|
||||
membership_event_stream_ordering = membership_event_map[
|
||||
membership_event_id
|
||||
].internal_metadata.stream_ordering
|
||||
assert membership_event_stream_ordering is not None
|
||||
membership_event_instance_name = membership_event_map[
|
||||
membership_event_id
|
||||
].internal_metadata.instance_name
|
||||
assert membership_event_instance_name is not None
|
||||
|
||||
membership_infos_to_insert_membership_snapshots.append(
|
||||
# XXX: We don't use `SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos` here
|
||||
# because we're sourcing the event from `events_and_contexts`, we
|
||||
# can't rely on `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` being correct. We
|
||||
# could be working with events that were previously persisted as an
|
||||
# `outlier` with one `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted
|
||||
# again and de-outliered and assigned a different `stream_ordering`
|
||||
# that won't end up being used. Since we call
|
||||
# `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before
|
||||
# `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use
|
||||
# the `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're
|
||||
# working with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will
|
||||
# possibly be unused and not make it into the `events` table.
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipInfo(
|
||||
user_id=user_id,
|
||||
sender=membership_event_map[membership_event_id].sender,
|
||||
membership_event_id=membership_event_id,
|
||||
membership=membership_event_map[membership_event_id].membership,
|
||||
membership_event_stream_ordering=membership_event_stream_ordering,
|
||||
membership_event_instance_name=membership_event_instance_name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -568,7 +568,6 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
# `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()`)
|
||||
#
|
||||
joined_room_updates: SlidingSyncStateInsertValues = {}
|
||||
best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering: Optional[int] = None
|
||||
bump_stamp_to_fully_insert: Optional[int] = None
|
||||
if not delta_state.no_longer_in_room:
|
||||
current_state_ids_map = {}
|
||||
|
@ -632,9 +631,7 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
|
||||
# Otherwise, we need to find a couple events that we were reset to.
|
||||
if missing_event_ids:
|
||||
remaining_events = await self.store.get_events(
|
||||
current_state_ids_map.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
remaining_events = await self.store.get_events(missing_event_ids)
|
||||
# There shouldn't be any missing events
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
remaining_events.keys() == missing_event_ids
|
||||
|
@ -657,52 +654,9 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
elif state_key == (EventTypes.Name, ""):
|
||||
joined_room_updates["room_name"] = None
|
||||
|
||||
# Figure out `best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering`. This doesn't need to
|
||||
# be perfect, we just need *some* answer that points to a real event in the
|
||||
# room in case we are the first ones inserting into the
|
||||
# `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` table because of the `NON NULL` constraint on
|
||||
# `event_stream_ordering`. In reality,
|
||||
# `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` is run after
|
||||
# `_update_current_state_txn()` whenever a new event is persisted to update
|
||||
# it to the correct latest value.
|
||||
#
|
||||
if len(events_and_contexts) > 0:
|
||||
# Since the list is sorted ascending by `stream_ordering`, the last event
|
||||
# should have the highest `stream_ordering`.
|
||||
best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering = events_and_contexts[-1][
|
||||
0
|
||||
].internal_metadata.stream_ordering
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# If there are no `events_and_contexts`, we assume it's one of two scenarios:
|
||||
# 1. If there are new state `to_insert` but no `events_and_contexts`,
|
||||
# then it's a state reset.
|
||||
# 2. Otherwise, it's some partial-state room re-syncing the current state and
|
||||
# going through un-partial process.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Either way, we assume no new events are being persisted and we can
|
||||
# find the latest already in the database. Since this is a best-effort
|
||||
# value, we don't need to be perfect although I think we're pretty close
|
||||
# here.
|
||||
most_recent_event_pos_results = (
|
||||
await self.store.get_last_event_pos_in_room(
|
||||
room_id, event_types=None
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert most_recent_event_pos_results, (
|
||||
f"We should not be seeing `None` here because we are still in the room ({room_id}) and "
|
||||
+ "it should at-least have a join membership event that's keeping us here."
|
||||
)
|
||||
best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering = most_recent_event_pos_results[
|
||||
1
|
||||
].stream
|
||||
|
||||
# We should have found a value if we are still in the room
|
||||
assert best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering is not None
|
||||
|
||||
return SlidingSyncTableChanges(
|
||||
room_id=room_id,
|
||||
# For `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`
|
||||
joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering=best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering,
|
||||
joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert=bump_stamp_to_fully_insert,
|
||||
joined_room_updates=joined_room_updates,
|
||||
# For `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots`
|
||||
|
@ -1773,31 +1727,53 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
#
|
||||
# We only need to update when one of the relevant state values has changed
|
||||
if sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates:
|
||||
# This should be *some* value that points to a real event in the room if
|
||||
# we are still joined to the room.
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering
|
||||
is not None
|
||||
sliding_sync_updates_keys = (
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates.keys()
|
||||
)
|
||||
sliding_sync_updates_values = (
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.db_pool.simple_upsert_txn(
|
||||
txn,
|
||||
table="sliding_sync_joined_rooms",
|
||||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||||
values=sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates,
|
||||
insertion_values={
|
||||
# The reason we're only *inserting* (not *updating*)
|
||||
# `event_stream_ordering` here is because the column has a `NON
|
||||
# NULL` constraint and we need *some* answer. And if the row
|
||||
# already exists, it already has the correct value and it's
|
||||
# better to just rely on
|
||||
# `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()`
|
||||
# to do the right thing (same for `bump_stamp`).
|
||||
"event_stream_ordering": sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering,
|
||||
# If we're trying to fully-insert a row, we need to provide a
|
||||
# value for `bump_stamp` if it exists for the room.
|
||||
"bump_stamp": sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert,
|
||||
},
|
||||
args: List[Any] = [
|
||||
room_id,
|
||||
room_id,
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert,
|
||||
]
|
||||
args.extend(iter(sliding_sync_updates_values))
|
||||
|
||||
# XXX: We use a sub-query for `stream_ordering` because it's unreliable to
|
||||
# pre-calculate from `events_and_contexts` at the time when
|
||||
# `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` is ran. We could be working
|
||||
# with events that were previously persisted as an `outlier` with one
|
||||
# `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted again and de-outliered
|
||||
# and assigned a different `stream_ordering`. Since we call
|
||||
# `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before
|
||||
# `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use the
|
||||
# `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're working
|
||||
# with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will possibly be
|
||||
# unused and not make it into the `events` table.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# We don't update `event_stream_ordering` `ON CONFLICT` because it's
|
||||
# simpler and we can just rely on
|
||||
# `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` to do
|
||||
# the right thing (same for `bump_stamp`). The only reason we're
|
||||
# inserting `event_stream_ordering` here is because the column has a
|
||||
# `NON NULL` constraint and we need some answer.
|
||||
txn.execute(
|
||||
f"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO sliding_sync_joined_rooms
|
||||
(room_id, event_stream_ordering, bump_stamp, {", ".join(sliding_sync_updates_keys)})
|
||||
VALUES (
|
||||
?,
|
||||
(SELECT stream_ordering FROM events WHERE room_id = ? ORDER BY stream_ordering DESC LIMIT 1),
|
||||
?,
|
||||
{", ".join("?" for _ in sliding_sync_updates_values)}
|
||||
)
|
||||
ON CONFLICT (room_id)
|
||||
DO UPDATE SET
|
||||
{", ".join(f"{key} = EXCLUDED.{key}" for key in sliding_sync_updates_keys)}
|
||||
""",
|
||||
args,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# We now update `local_current_membership`. We do this regardless
|
||||
|
@ -1854,38 +1830,63 @@ class PersistEventsStore:
|
|||
if sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots:
|
||||
# Update the `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` table
|
||||
#
|
||||
# We need to insert/update regardless of whether we have `sliding_sync_snapshot_keys`
|
||||
# because there are other fields in the `ON CONFLICT` upsert to run (see
|
||||
# inherit case above for more context when this happens).
|
||||
self.db_pool.simple_upsert_many_txn(
|
||||
txn=txn,
|
||||
table="sliding_sync_membership_snapshots",
|
||||
key_names=("room_id", "user_id"),
|
||||
key_values=[
|
||||
(room_id, membership_info.user_id)
|
||||
for membership_info in sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots
|
||||
],
|
||||
value_names=[
|
||||
"sender",
|
||||
"membership_event_id",
|
||||
"membership",
|
||||
"event_stream_ordering",
|
||||
"event_instance_name",
|
||||
]
|
||||
+ list(
|
||||
sliding_sync_snapshot_keys = (
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.keys()
|
||||
),
|
||||
value_values=[
|
||||
)
|
||||
sliding_sync_snapshot_values = (
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
# We need to insert/update regardless of whether we have
|
||||
# `sliding_sync_snapshot_keys` because there are other fields in the `ON
|
||||
# CONFLICT` upsert to run (see inherit case (explained in
|
||||
# `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()`) for more context when this
|
||||
# happens).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# XXX: We use a sub-query for `stream_ordering` because it's unreliable to
|
||||
# pre-calculate from `events_and_contexts` at the time when
|
||||
# `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` is ran. We could be working with
|
||||
# events that were previously persisted as an `outlier` with one
|
||||
# `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted again and de-outliered and
|
||||
# assigned a different `stream_ordering` that won't end up being used. Since
|
||||
# we call `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before
|
||||
# `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use the
|
||||
# `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're working
|
||||
# with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will possibly be unused
|
||||
# and not make it into the `events` table.
|
||||
txn.execute_batch(
|
||||
f"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO sliding_sync_membership_snapshots
|
||||
(room_id, user_id, sender, membership_event_id, membership, event_stream_ordering, event_instance_name
|
||||
{("," + ", ".join(sliding_sync_snapshot_keys)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_keys else ""})
|
||||
VALUES (
|
||||
?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
|
||||
(SELECT stream_ordering FROM events WHERE event_id = ?),
|
||||
(SELECT instance_name FROM events WHERE event_id = ?)
|
||||
{("," + ", ".join("?" for _ in sliding_sync_snapshot_values)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_values else ""}
|
||||
)
|
||||
ON CONFLICT (room_id, user_id)
|
||||
DO UPDATE SET
|
||||
sender = EXCLUDED.sender,
|
||||
membership_event_id = EXCLUDED.membership_event_id,
|
||||
membership = EXCLUDED.membership,
|
||||
event_stream_ordering = EXCLUDED.event_stream_ordering
|
||||
{("," + ", ".join(f"{key} = EXCLUDED.{key}" for key in sliding_sync_snapshot_keys)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_keys else ""}
|
||||
""",
|
||||
[
|
||||
[
|
||||
room_id,
|
||||
membership_info.user_id,
|
||||
membership_info.sender,
|
||||
membership_info.membership_event_id,
|
||||
membership_info.membership,
|
||||
membership_info.membership_event_stream_ordering,
|
||||
membership_info.membership_event_instance_name,
|
||||
# XXX: We do not use `membership_info.membership_event_stream_ordering` here
|
||||
# because it is an unreliable value. See XXX note above.
|
||||
membership_info.membership_event_id,
|
||||
# XXX: We do not use `membership_info.membership_event_instance_name` here
|
||||
# because it is an unreliable value. See XXX note above.
|
||||
membership_info.membership_event_id,
|
||||
]
|
||||
+ list(
|
||||
sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
+ list(sliding_sync_snapshot_values)
|
||||
for membership_info in sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ from synapse.storage.database import (
|
|||
from synapse.storage.databases.main.events import (
|
||||
SLIDING_SYNC_RELEVANT_STATE_SET,
|
||||
PersistEventsStore,
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipInfo,
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos,
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipSnapshotSharedInsertValues,
|
||||
SlidingSyncStateInsertValues,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -1994,9 +1994,9 @@ class EventsBackgroundUpdatesStore(StreamWorkerStore, StateDeltasStore, SQLBaseS
|
|||
to_insert_membership_snapshots: Dict[
|
||||
Tuple[str, str], SlidingSyncMembershipSnapshotSharedInsertValues
|
||||
] = {}
|
||||
to_insert_membership_infos: Dict[Tuple[str, str], SlidingSyncMembershipInfo] = (
|
||||
{}
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_insert_membership_infos: Dict[
|
||||
Tuple[str, str], SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos
|
||||
] = {}
|
||||
for (
|
||||
room_id,
|
||||
room_id_from_rooms_table,
|
||||
|
@ -2185,7 +2185,8 @@ class EventsBackgroundUpdatesStore(StreamWorkerStore, StateDeltasStore, SQLBaseS
|
|||
to_insert_membership_snapshots[(room_id, user_id)] = (
|
||||
sliding_sync_membership_snapshots_insert_map
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_insert_membership_infos[(room_id, user_id)] = SlidingSyncMembershipInfo(
|
||||
to_insert_membership_infos[(room_id, user_id)] = (
|
||||
SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos(
|
||||
user_id=user_id,
|
||||
sender=sender,
|
||||
membership_event_id=membership_event_id,
|
||||
|
@ -2195,6 +2196,7 @@ class EventsBackgroundUpdatesStore(StreamWorkerStore, StateDeltasStore, SQLBaseS
|
|||
membership_event_instance_name=membership_event_instance_name
|
||||
or "master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _fill_table_txn(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
|
||||
# Handle updating the `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` table
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ from synapse.storage.databases.main.events_bg_updates import (
|
|||
_resolve_stale_data_in_sliding_sync_joined_rooms_table,
|
||||
_resolve_stale_data_in_sliding_sync_membership_snapshots_table,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from synapse.types import create_requester
|
||||
from synapse.util import Clock
|
||||
|
||||
from tests.test_utils.event_injection import create_event
|
||||
|
@ -925,6 +926,128 @@ class SlidingSyncTablesTestCase(SlidingSyncTablesTestCaseBase):
|
|||
user2_snapshot,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@parameterized.expand(
|
||||
# Test both an insert an upsert into the
|
||||
# `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`/`sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` to exercise
|
||||
# more possibilities of things going wrong.
|
||||
[
|
||||
("insert", True),
|
||||
("upsert", False),
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
def test_joined_room_outlier_and_deoutlier(
|
||||
self, description: str, should_insert: bool
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
This is a regression test.
|
||||
|
||||
This is to simulate the case where an event is first persisted as an outlier
|
||||
(like a remote invite) and then later persisted again to de-outlier it. The
|
||||
first the time, the `outlier` is persisted with one `stream_ordering` but when
|
||||
persisted again and de-outliered, it is assigned a different `stream_ordering`
|
||||
that won't end up being used. Since we call
|
||||
`_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before `_update_outliers_txn()` which
|
||||
fixes this discrepancy (always use the `stream_ordering` from the first time it
|
||||
was persisted), make sure we're not using an unreliable `stream_ordering` values
|
||||
that will cause `FOREIGN KEY constraint failed` in the
|
||||
`sliding_sync_joined_rooms`/`sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` tables.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
||||
_user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
||||
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
||||
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
||||
|
||||
room_version = RoomVersions.V10
|
||||
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
||||
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=room_version.identifier
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if should_insert:
|
||||
# Clear these out so we always insert
|
||||
self.get_success(
|
||||
self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
|
||||
table="sliding_sync_joined_rooms",
|
||||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||||
desc="TODO",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.get_success(
|
||||
self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
|
||||
table="sliding_sync_membership_snapshots",
|
||||
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
|
||||
desc="TODO",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Create a membership event (which triggers an insert into
|
||||
# `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots`)
|
||||
membership_event_dict = {
|
||||
"type": EventTypes.Member,
|
||||
"state_key": user1_id,
|
||||
"sender": user1_id,
|
||||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||||
"content": {EventContentFields.MEMBERSHIP: Membership.JOIN},
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Create a relevant state event (which triggers an insert into
|
||||
# `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`)
|
||||
state_event_dict = {
|
||||
"type": EventTypes.Name,
|
||||
"state_key": "",
|
||||
"sender": user2_id,
|
||||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||||
"content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_NAME: "my super room"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
event_dicts_to_persist = [
|
||||
membership_event_dict,
|
||||
state_event_dict,
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for event_dict in event_dicts_to_persist:
|
||||
events_to_persist = []
|
||||
|
||||
# Create the events as an outliers
|
||||
(
|
||||
event,
|
||||
unpersisted_context,
|
||||
) = self.get_success(
|
||||
self.hs.get_event_creation_handler().create_event(
|
||||
requester=create_requester(user1_id),
|
||||
event_dict=event_dict,
|
||||
outlier=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
# FIXME: Should we use an `EventContext.for_outlier(...)` here?
|
||||
# Doesn't seem to matter for this test.
|
||||
context = self.get_success(unpersisted_context.persist(event))
|
||||
events_to_persist.append((event, context))
|
||||
|
||||
# Create the event again but as an non-outlier. This will de-outlier the event
|
||||
# when we persist it.
|
||||
(
|
||||
event,
|
||||
unpersisted_context,
|
||||
) = self.get_success(
|
||||
self.hs.get_event_creation_handler().create_event(
|
||||
requester=create_requester(user1_id),
|
||||
event_dict=event_dict,
|
||||
outlier=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
context = self.get_success(unpersisted_context.persist(event))
|
||||
events_to_persist.append((event, context))
|
||||
|
||||
persist_controller = self.hs.get_storage_controllers().persistence
|
||||
assert persist_controller is not None
|
||||
for event, context in events_to_persist:
|
||||
self.get_success(
|
||||
persist_controller.persist_event(
|
||||
event,
|
||||
context,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# We're just testing that it does not explode
|
||||
|
||||
def test_joined_room_meta_state_reset(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Test that a state reset on the room name is reflected in the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue