synapse/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

3009 lines
118 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
#
# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
#
# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
#
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
# License, or (at your option) any later version.
#
# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
#
# Originally licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0:
# <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>.
#
# [This file includes modifications made by New Vector Limited]
#
#
import logging
from copy import deepcopy
from typing import Optional
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
from unittest.mock import patch
from parameterized import parameterized
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
from synapse.api.constants import (
AccountDataTypes,
EventContentFields,
EventTypes,
JoinRules,
Membership,
RoomTypes,
)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import RoomSyncConfig, StateValues
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
from synapse.rest import admin
from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID
from synapse.types.handlers import SlidingSyncConfig
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
from synapse.util import Clock
from tests.replication._base import BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase
from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, TestCase
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
class RoomSyncConfigTestCase(TestCase):
def _assert_room_config_equal(
self,
actual: RoomSyncConfig,
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
message_prefix: Optional[str] = None,
) -> None:
self.assertEqual(actual.timeline_limit, expected.timeline_limit, message_prefix)
# `self.assertEqual(...)` works fine to catch differences but the output is
# almost impossible to read because of the way it truncates the output and the
# order doesn't actually matter.
self.assertCountEqual(
actual.required_state_map, expected.required_state_map, message_prefix
)
for event_type, expected_state_keys in expected.required_state_map.items():
self.assertCountEqual(
actual.required_state_map[event_type],
expected_state_keys,
f"{message_prefix}: Mismatch for {event_type}",
)
@parameterized.expand(
[
(
"from_list_config",
"""
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList` to a
`RoomSyncConfig`.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
"@foo",
"@bar",
"@baz",
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
),
(
"from_room_subscription",
"""
Test that we can convert a `SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription` to a
`RoomSyncConfig`.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.RoomSubscription(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
"@foo",
"@bar",
"@baz",
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard",
"""
Test that a wildcard (*) for both the `event_type` and `state_key` will override
all other values.
Note: MSC3575 describes different behavior to how we're handling things here but
since it's not wrong to return more state than requested (`required_state` is
just the minimum requested), it doesn't matter if we include things that the
client wanted excluded. This complexity is also under scrutiny, see
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575#discussion_r1185109050
> One unique exception is when you request all state events via ["*", "*"]. When used,
> all state events are returned by default, and additional entries FILTER OUT the returned set
> of state events. These additional entries cannot use '*' themselves.
> For example, ["*", "*"], ["m.room.member", "@alice:example.com"] will _exclude_ every m.room.member
> event _except_ for @alice:example.com, and include every other state event.
> In addition, ["*", "*"], ["m.space.child", "*"] is an error, the m.space.child filter is not
> required as it would have been returned anyway.
>
> -- MSC3575 (https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575)
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard_type",
"""
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values for the
same `state_key`.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
},
),
),
(
"multiple_wildcard_type",
"""
Test that multiple wildcard (*) as a `event_type` will override all other values
for the same `state_key`.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, "@foo"),
("org.matrix.personal_count", "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@foo",
},
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard_state_key",
"""
Test that a wildcard (*) as a `state_key` will override all other values for the
same `event_type`.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
StateValues.WILDCARD,
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard_merge",
"""
Test that a wildcard (*) entries for the `event_type` and another one for
`state_key` will play together.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard_merge2",
"""
Test that an all wildcard ("*", "*") entry will override any other
values (including other wildcards).
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
# One of these should take precedence over everything else
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(StateValues.WILDCARD, StateValues.WILDCARD),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
(
"lazy_members",
"""
`$LAZY` room members should just be another additional key next to other
explicit keys. We will unroll the special `$LAZY` meaning later.
""",
# Input
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state=[
(EventTypes.Name, ""),
(EventTypes.Member, "@foo"),
(EventTypes.Member, "@bar"),
(EventTypes.Member, StateValues.LAZY),
(EventTypes.Member, "@baz"),
(EventTypes.CanonicalAlias, ""),
],
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
"@foo",
"@bar",
StateValues.LAZY,
"@baz",
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
),
]
)
def test_from_room_config(
self,
_test_label: str,
_test_description: str,
room_params: SlidingSyncConfig.CommonRoomParameters,
expected_room_sync_config: RoomSyncConfig,
) -> None:
"""
Test `RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)` will result in the `expected_room_sync_config`.
"""
room_sync_config = RoomSyncConfig.from_room_config(room_params)
self._assert_room_config_equal(
room_sync_config,
expected_room_sync_config,
)
@parameterized.expand(
[
(
"no_direct_overlap",
# A
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=9,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
"@foo",
"@bar",
},
},
),
# B
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Member: {
StateValues.LAZY,
"@baz",
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Name: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {
"@foo",
"@bar",
StateValues.LAZY,
"@baz",
},
EventTypes.CanonicalAlias: {""},
},
),
),
(
"wildcard_overlap",
# A
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
# B
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=9,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {"@bar"},
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
},
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
StateValues.WILDCARD: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
(
"state_type_wildcard_overlap",
# A
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@foo",
},
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
},
),
# B
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=9,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@bar",
},
EventTypes.Member: {"@foo"},
},
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {
"dummy",
"dummy2",
},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@foo",
"@bar",
},
},
),
),
(
"state_key_wildcard_overlap",
# A
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
# B
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=9,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
"org.matrix.flowers": {"tulips"},
},
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
"org.matrix.flowers": {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
(
"state_type_and_state_key_wildcard_merge",
# A
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@foo",
},
EventTypes.Member: {"@bar"},
},
),
# B
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=9,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {"dummy2"},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {""},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
# Expected
RoomSyncConfig(
timeline_limit=10,
required_state_map={
EventTypes.Dummy: {
"dummy",
"dummy2",
},
StateValues.WILDCARD: {
"",
"@foo",
},
EventTypes.Member: {StateValues.WILDCARD},
},
),
),
]
)
def test_combine_room_sync_config(
self,
_test_label: str,
a: RoomSyncConfig,
b: RoomSyncConfig,
expected: RoomSyncConfig,
) -> None:
"""
Combine A into B and B into A to make sure we get the same result.
"""
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
# Combine B into A
room_sync_config_a.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_b)
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_a, expected, "B into A")
# Since we're mutating these in place, make a copy for each of our trials
room_sync_config_a = deepcopy(a)
room_sync_config_b = deepcopy(b)
# Combine A into B
room_sync_config_b.combine_room_sync_config(room_sync_config_a)
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_b, expected, "A into B")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it returns
the correct list of rooms IDs.
"""
servlets = [
admin.register_servlets,
knock.register_servlets,
login.register_servlets,
room.register_servlets,
]
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
config = super().default_config()
# Enable sliding sync
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
return config
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_no_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
Test when the user has never joined any rooms before
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
# user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=now_token,
to_token=now_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_get_newly_joined_room(self) -> None:
"""
Test that rooms that the user has newly_joined show up. newly_joined is when you
join after the `from_token` and <= `to_token`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
# from/to range)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
)
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because we joined during the token
# range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
"""
Test that rooms that the user is already joined show up.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
# It should be pointing to the join event (latest membership event in the
# from/to range)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
"""
Test that rooms that the user is invited to, banned from, and knocked on show
up.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Setup the invited room (user2 invites user1 to the room)
invited_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
invited_room_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
ban_response = self.helper.ban(
ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
# Setup the knock room (user1 knocks on the room)
knock_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=RoomVersions.V7.identifier
)
self.helper.send_state(
knock_room_id,
EventTypes.JoinRules,
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
tok=user2_tok,
)
# User1 knocks on the room
knock_channel = self.make_request(
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
"POST",
"/_matrix/client/r0/knock/%s" % (knock_room_id,),
b"{}",
user1_tok,
)
self.assertEqual(knock_channel.code, 200, knock_channel.result)
knock_room_membership_state_event = self.get_success(
self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state_event(
knock_room_id, EventTypes.Member, user1_id
)
)
assert knock_room_membership_state_event is not None
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
)
)
# Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results.keys(),
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
{
invited_room_id,
ban_room_id,
knock_room_id,
},
)
# It should be pointing to the the respective membership event (latest
# membership event in the from/to range)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[invited_room_id].event_id,
invite_response["event_id"],
)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[ban_room_id].event_id,
ban_response["event_id"],
)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[knock_room_id].event_id,
knock_room_membership_state_event.event_id,
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
# of the `to_token`.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
"""
Test that a room that the user was kicked from still shows up. When the user
comes back to their client, they should see that they were kicked.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Kick user1 from the room
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room=kick_room_id,
src=user2_id,
targ=user1_id,
tok=user2_tok,
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
extra_data={
"reason": "Bad manners",
},
)
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_kick_token,
to_token=after_kick_token,
)
)
# The kicked room should show up
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
kick_response["event_id"],
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
# of the `to_token`.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
Forgotten rooms do not show up even if we forget after the from/to range.
Ideally, we would be able to track when the `/forget` happens and apply it
accordingly in the token range but the forgotten flag is only an extra bool in
the `room_memberships` table.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# Setup a normal room that we leave. This won't show up in the sync response
# because we left it before our token but is good to check anyway.
leave_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
self.helper.join(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.ban(ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Kick user1 from the room
self.helper.change_membership(
room=kick_room_id,
src=user2_id,
targ=user1_id,
tok=user2_tok,
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
extra_data={
"reason": "Bad manners",
},
)
before_room_forgets = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Forget the room after we already have our tokens. This doesn't change
# the membership event itself but will mark it internally in Synapse
channel = self.make_request(
"POST",
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{leave_room_id}/forget",
content={},
access_token=user1_tok,
)
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
channel = self.make_request(
"POST",
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{ban_room_id}/forget",
content={},
access_token=user1_tok,
)
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
channel = self.make_request(
"POST",
f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{kick_room_id}/forget",
content={},
access_token=user1_tok,
)
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_forgets,
to_token=before_room_forgets,
)
)
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
"""
Test that newly_left rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
_leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room2_token,
)
)
# Only the newly_left room should show up
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range but
# the `event_id` is `None` because we left the room causing the server to leave
# the room because no other local users are in it (quirk of the
# `current_state_delta_stream` table that we source things from)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
None, # _leave_response2["event_id"],
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are instead `newly_left`
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Rooms we join after the `to_token` should *not* show up. See condition "1b)"
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Room join after our `to_token` shouldn't show up
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response1["event_id"],
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined during the
from_token/to_token. See condition "1a)" comments in the
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# We should still see the room because we were joined during the
# from_token/to_token time period.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined before the `from_token`
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# We should still see the room because we were joined before the `from_token`
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were kicked before the `from_token`
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
)
join_response1 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
# Kick user1 from the room
kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room=kick_room_id,
src=user2_id,
targ=user1_id,
tok=user2_tok,
membership=Membership.LEAVE,
extra_data={
"reason": "Bad manners",
},
)
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave the room after we already have our tokens
#
# We have to join before we can leave (leave -> leave isn't a valid transition
# or at least it doesn't work in Synapse, 403 forbidden)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response = self.helper.leave(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_kick_token,
to_token=after_kick_token,
)
)
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
kick_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"kick_response": kick_response["event_id"],
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were kicked
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1a)"
comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
leave_response1["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1b)" comments
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room during the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
leave_response1["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
"""
Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we we're
joined up to the `to_token`.
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it adds `newly_left`
rooms to the response.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join room1
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
# Join and leave the room2 before the `to_token`
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join the room2 after we already have our tokens
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response1["event_id"],
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because there is no `from_token` to
# define a "live" range to compare against
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Test when the provided `from_token` comes after the `to_token`. We should
basically expect the same result as having no `from_token`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id4 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join room1 before `before_room_token`
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
# Join and leave the room2 before `before_room_token`
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after
# the `to_token` in this test
to_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join room2 after `before_room_token`
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# --------
# Join room3 after `before_room_token`
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Join and leave the room4 after `before_room_token`
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after the
# `to_token` in this test
from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join the room4 after we already have our tokens
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=from_token,
to_token=to_token,
)
)
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
#
# There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
# `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response1["event_id"],
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined `room1` before either of the tokens
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments
in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
`get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join the room after we already have our tokens
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Join and leave multiple times shouldn't affect rooms from showing up. It just
matters that we were joined or newly_left in the from/to range. But we're also
testing that joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the
results.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response2["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Join and leave multiple times before the from/to range shouldn't affect rooms
from showing up. It just matters that we were joined or newly_left in the
from/to range. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response2["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"leave_response1": leave_response1["event_id"],
"join_response2": join_response2["event_id"],
"leave_response2": leave_response2["event_id"],
"join_response3": join_response3["event_id"],
"leave_response3": leave_response3["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Make it look like we joined after the token range but we were invited before the
from/to range so the room should still show up. See condition "1a)" comments in
the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Invited to the room before the token
invite_response = self.helper.invite(
room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
join_respsonse = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
invite_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"invite_response": invite_response["event_id"],
"join_respsonse": join_respsonse["event_id"],
"leave_response": leave_response["event_id"],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were only invited before the
# token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
def test_join_and_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Update the displayname during the token range
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Update the displayname after the token range
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
}
),
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
def test_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
if there is `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Update the displayname during the token range
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_change1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_change1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
def test_display_name_changes_before_and_after_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that we point to the correct membership event even though there are no
membership events in the from/range but there are `displayname`/`avatar_url`
changes before/after the token range.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Update the displayname before the token range
displayname_change_before_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Update the displayname after the token range
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
displayname_change_before_token_range_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"displayname_change_before_token_range_response": displayname_change_before_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
}
),
)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
def test_display_name_changes_leave_after_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that we point to the correct membership event within the from/to range even
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates and we leave after the `to_token`.
See condition "1a)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Update the displayname during the token range
displayname_change_during_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Update the displayname after the token range
displayname_change_after_token_range_response = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
# Leave after the token
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
displayname_change_during_token_range_response["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response": join_response["event_id"],
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response": displayname_change_during_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
"displayname_change_after_token_range_response": displayname_change_after_token_range_response[
"event_id"
],
}
),
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
def test_display_name_changes_join_after_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that multiple `join` membership events (after the `to_token`) in a row
indicating `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates doesn't affect the results (we
joined after the token range so it shouldn't show up)
See condition "1b)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Update the displayname after the token range
self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname after token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room shouldn't show up because we joined after the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
def test_newly_joined_with_leave_join_in_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that even though we're joined before the token range, if we leave and join
within the token range, it's still counted as `newly_joined`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave and join back during the token range
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_more_changes_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_more_changes_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because we were joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response2["event_id"],
)
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because there is some non-join event in
# between our latest join event.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
def test_newly_joined_only_joins_during_token_range(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that a join and more joins caused by display name changes, all during the
token range, still count as `newly_joined`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
displayname_change_during_token_range_response1 = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
# Update the displayname during the token range (looks like another join)
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2 = self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
event_type=EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user1_id,
body={
"membership": Membership.JOIN,
"displayname": "displayname during token range",
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
# Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
displayname_change_during_token_range_response2["event_id"],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque event IDs: "
+ str(
{
"join_response1": join_response1["event_id"],
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response1": displayname_change_during_token_range_response1[
"event_id"
],
"displayname_change_during_token_range_response2": displayname_change_during_token_range_response2[
"event_id"
],
}
),
)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we first joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Test that multiple rooms are not confused as we fixup the list. This test is
spawning from a real world bug in the code where I was accidentally using
`event.room_id` in one of the fix-up loops but the `event` being referenced was
actually from a different loop.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Invited and left the room before the token
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Invited to room2
self.helper.invite(room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
before_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Invited and left room3 during the from/to range
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
self.helper.invite(room_id3, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room2
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room3
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room3_token,
to_token=after_room3_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results.keys(),
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
{
# `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
#
# Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
room_id2,
# Room should show up because it was newly_left during the from/to range
room_id3,
},
)
class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
"""
Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it works with
sharded event stream_writers enabled
"""
servlets = [
admin.register_servlets_for_client_rest_resource,
room.register_servlets,
login.register_servlets,
]
def default_config(self) -> dict:
config = super().default_config()
# Enable sliding sync
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
# Enable shared event stream_writers
config["stream_writers"] = {"events": ["worker1", "worker2", "worker3"]}
config["instance_map"] = {
"main": {"host": "testserv", "port": 8765},
"worker1": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1001},
"worker2": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1002},
"worker3": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1003},
}
return config
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
def _create_room(self, room_id: str, user_id: str, tok: str) -> None:
"""
Create a room with a specific room_id. We use this so that that we have a
consistent room_id across test runs that hashes to the same value and will be
sharded to a known worker in the tests.
"""
# We control the room ID generation by patching out the
# `_generate_room_id` method
with patch(
"synapse.handlers.room.RoomCreationHandler._generate_room_id"
) as mock:
mock.side_effect = lambda: room_id
self.helper.create_room_as(user_id, tok=tok)
def test_sharded_event_persisters(self) -> None:
"""
This test should catch bugs that would come from flawed stream position
(`stream_ordering`) comparisons or making `RoomStreamToken`'s naively. To
compare event positions properly, you need to consider both the `instance_name`
and `stream_ordering` together.
The test creates three event persister workers and a room that is sharded to
each worker. On worker2, we make the event stream position stuck so that it lags
behind the other workers and we start getting `RoomStreamToken` that have an
`instance_map` component (i.e. q`m{min_pos}~{writer1}.{pos1}~{writer2}.{pos2}`).
We then send some events to advance the stream positions of worker1 and worker3
but worker2 is lagging behind because it's stuck. We are specifically testing
that `get_sync_room_ids_for_user(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
correctly in these adverse conditions.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
self.make_worker_hs(
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
{"worker_name": "worker1"},
)
worker_hs2 = self.make_worker_hs(
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
{"worker_name": "worker2"},
)
self.make_worker_hs(
"synapse.app.generic_worker",
{"worker_name": "worker3"},
)
# Specially crafted room IDs that get persisted on different workers.
#
# Sharded to worker1
room_id1 = "!fooo:test"
# Sharded to worker2
room_id2 = "!bar:test"
# Sharded to worker3
room_id3 = "!quux:test"
# Create rooms on the different workers.
self._create_room(room_id1, user2_id, user2_tok)
self._create_room(room_id2, user2_id, user2_tok)
self._create_room(room_id3, user2_id, user2_tok)
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room2
self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room3
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Ensure that the events were sharded to different workers.
pos1 = self.get_success(
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response1["event_id"])
)
self.assertEqual(pos1.instance_name, "worker1")
pos2 = self.get_success(
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response2["event_id"])
)
self.assertEqual(pos2.instance_name, "worker2")
pos3 = self.get_success(
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response3["event_id"])
)
self.assertEqual(pos3.instance_name, "worker3")
before_stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# We now gut wrench into the events stream `MultiWriterIdGenerator` on worker2 to
# mimic it getting stuck persisting an event. This ensures that when we send an
# event on worker1/worker3 we end up in a state where worker2 events stream
# position lags that on worker1/worker3, resulting in a RoomStreamToken with a
# non-empty `instance_map` component.
#
# Worker2's event stream position will not advance until we call `__aexit__`
# again.
worker_store2 = worker_hs2.get_datastores().main
assert isinstance(worker_store2._stream_id_gen, MultiWriterIdGenerator)
actx = worker_store2._stream_id_gen.get_next()
self.get_success(actx.__aenter__())
# For room_id1/worker1: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
# and generate membership changes.
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# For room_id2/worker2: which is currently stuck, join the room.
join_on_worker2_response = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# For room_id3/worker3: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
# and generate membership changes.
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_on_worker3_response = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Get a token while things are stuck after our activity
stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Let's make sure we're working with a token that has an `instance_map`
self.assertNotEqual(len(stuck_activity_token.room_key.instance_map), 0)
# Just double check that the join event on worker2 (that is stuck) happened
# after the position recorded for worker2 in the token but before the max
# position in the token. This is crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
join_on_worker2_pos = self.get_success(
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker2_response["event_id"])
)
# Ensure the join technially came after our token
self.assertGreater(
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker2"),
)
# But less than the max stream position of some other worker
self.assertLess(
join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
# max
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_max_stream_pos(),
)
# Just double check that the join event on worker3 happened after the min stream
# value in the token but still within the position recorded for worker3. This is
# crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
join_on_worker3_pos = self.get_success(
self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker3_response["event_id"])
)
# Ensure the join came after the min but still encapsulated by the token
self.assertGreaterEqual(
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
# min
stuck_activity_token.room_key.stream,
)
self.assertLessEqual(
join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker3"),
)
# We finish the fake persisting an event we started above and advance worker2's
# event stream position (unstuck worker2).
self.get_success(actx.__aexit__(None, None, None))
# The function under test
room_id_results = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_stuck_activity_token,
to_token=stuck_activity_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results.keys(),
2024-06-06 22:44:32 +03:00
{
room_id1,
# room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
# and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was stuck.
# This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
# `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2
# wasn't advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the
# join technically comes after `stuck_activity_token``.
#
# room_id2,
room_id3,
},
)
class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
Tests Sliding Sync handler `filter_rooms()` to make sure it includes/excludes rooms
correctly.
"""
servlets = [
admin.register_servlets,
knock.register_servlets,
login.register_servlets,
room.register_servlets,
]
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
config = super().default_config()
# Enable sliding sync
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
return config
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
def _create_dm_room(
self,
inviter_user_id: str,
inviter_tok: str,
invitee_user_id: str,
invitee_tok: str,
) -> str:
"""
Helper to create a DM room as the "inviter" and invite the "invitee" user to the room. The
"invitee" user also will join the room. The `m.direct` account data will be set
for both users.
"""
# Create a room and send an invite the other user
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
inviter_user_id,
is_public=False,
tok=inviter_tok,
)
self.helper.invite(
room_id,
src=inviter_user_id,
targ=invitee_user_id,
tok=inviter_tok,
extra_data={"is_direct": True},
)
# Person that was invited joins the room
self.helper.join(room_id, invitee_user_id, tok=invitee_tok)
# Mimic the client setting the room as a direct message in the global account
# data
self.get_success(
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
invitee_user_id,
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
{inviter_user_id: [room_id]},
)
)
self.get_success(
self.store.add_account_data_for_user(
inviter_user_id,
AccountDataTypes.DIRECT,
{invitee_user_id: [room_id]},
)
)
return room_id
def test_filter_dm_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
Test `filter.is_dm` for DM rooms
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# Create a normal room
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Create a DM room
dm_room_id = self._create_dm_room(
inviter_user_id=user1_id,
inviter_tok=user1_tok,
invitee_user_id=user2_id,
invitee_tok=user2_tok,
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Try with `is_dm=True`
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_dm=True,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {dm_room_id})
# Try with `is_dm=False`
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_dm=False,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
def test_filter_encrypted_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
Test `filter.is_encrypted` for encrypted rooms
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a normal room
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Create an encrypted room
encrypted_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.send_state(
encrypted_room_id,
EventTypes.RoomEncryption,
{"algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2"},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Try with `is_encrypted=True`
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_encrypted=True,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {encrypted_room_id})
# Try with `is_encrypted=False`
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_encrypted=False,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
def test_filter_invite_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
Test `filter.is_invite` for rooms that the user has been invited to
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
# Create a normal room
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.join(room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Create a room that user1 is invited to
invite_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.invite(invite_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Try with `is_invite=True`
truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_invite=True,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {invite_room_id})
# Try with `is_invite=False`
falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
is_invite=False,
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
def test_filter_room_types(self) -> None:
"""
Test `filter.room_types` for different room types
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a normal room (no room type)
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Create a space room
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
extra_content={
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
},
)
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
extra_content={
"creation_content": {
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
}
},
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Try finding only normal rooms
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[None]),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
# Try finding only spaces
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
# Try finding normal rooms and spaces
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, space_room_id})
# Try finding an arbitrary room type
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
room_types=["org.matrix.foobarbaz"]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
def test_filter_not_room_types(self) -> None:
"""
Test `filter.not_room_types` for different room types
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Create a normal room (no room type)
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Create a space room
space_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
extra_content={
"creation_content": {EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: RoomTypes.SPACE}
},
)
# Create an arbitrarily typed room
foo_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
extra_content={
"creation_content": {
EventContentFields.ROOM_TYPE: "org.matrix.foobarbaz"
}
},
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(not_room_types=[None]),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id, foo_room_id})
# Try finding *NOT* spaces
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
not_room_types=[RoomTypes.SPACE]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id, foo_room_id})
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms or spaces
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
not_room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {foo_room_id})
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
# `not_room_types` should win.
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
room_types=[None], not_room_types=[None]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Nothing matches because nothing is both a normal room and not a normal room
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), set())
# Test how it behaves when we have both `room_types` and `not_room_types`.
# `not_room_types` should win.
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
sync_room_map,
SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
room_types=[None, RoomTypes.SPACE], not_room_types=[None]
),
after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(filtered_room_map.keys(), {space_room_id})
class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
Tests Sliding Sync handler `sort_rooms()` to make sure it sorts/orders rooms
correctly.
"""
servlets = [
admin.register_servlets,
knock.register_servlets,
login.register_servlets,
room.register_servlets,
]
def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
config = super().default_config()
# Enable sliding sync
config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
return config
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
def test_sort_activity_basic(self) -> None:
"""
Rooms with newer activity are sorted first.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
Add `rooms.bump_stamp` to Sliding Sync `/sync` for easier client-side sorting (#17395) `bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
2024-07-08 21:17:08 +03:00
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(
Add `rooms.bump_stamp` to Sliding Sync `/sync` for easier client-side sorting (#17395) `bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
2024-07-08 21:17:08 +03:00
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
[room_id2, room_id1],
)
@parameterized.expand(
[
(Membership.LEAVE,),
(Membership.INVITE,),
(Membership.KNOCK,),
(Membership.BAN,),
]
)
def test_activity_after_xxx(self, room1_membership: str) -> None:
"""
When someone has left/been invited/knocked/been banned from a room, they
shouldn't take anything into account after that membership event.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
before_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Create the rooms as user2 so we can have user1 with a clean slate to work from
# and join in whatever order we need for the tests.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# If we're testing knocks, set the room to knock
if room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
self.helper.send_state(
room_id1,
EventTypes.JoinRules,
{"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
tok=user2_tok,
)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Here is the activity with user1 that will determine the sort of the rooms
# (room2, room1, room3)
self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
if room1_membership == Membership.LEAVE:
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
elif room1_membership == Membership.INVITE:
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
elif room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
self.helper.knock(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
elif room1_membership == Membership.BAN:
self.helper.ban(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Activity before the token but the user is only been xxx to this room so it
# shouldn't be taken into account
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Activity after the token. Just make it in a different order than what we
# expect to make sure we're not taking the activity after the token into
# account.
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id2, "activity in room2", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user2_tok)
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_rooms_token,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
Add `rooms.bump_stamp` to Sliding Sync `/sync` for easier client-side sorting (#17395) `bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
2024-07-08 21:17:08 +03:00
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(
Add `rooms.bump_stamp` to Sliding Sync `/sync` for easier client-side sorting (#17395) `bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
2024-07-08 21:17:08 +03:00
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
[room_id2, room_id1, room_id3],
"Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque room IDs: "
+ str(
{
"room_id1": room_id1,
"room_id2": room_id2,
"room_id3": room_id3,
}
),
)
Add `rooms.bump_stamp` to Sliding Sync `/sync` for easier client-side sorting (#17395) `bump_stamp` corresponds to the `stream_ordering` of the latest `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` in the room. This helps clients sort more readily without them needing to pull in a bunch of the timeline to determine the last activity. `bump_event_types` is a thing because for example, we don't want display name changes to mark the room as unread and bump it to the top. For encrypted rooms, we just have to consider any activity as a bump because we can't see the content and the client has to figure it out for themselves. Outside of Synapse, `bump_stamp` is just a free-form counter so other implementations could use `received_ts`or `origin_server_ts` (see the [*Security considerations* section in MSC3575 about the potential pitfalls of using `origin_server_ts`](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#security-considerations)). It doesn't have any guarantee about always going up. In the Synapse case, it could go down if an event was redacted/removed (or purged in cases of retention policies). In the future, we could add `bump_event_types` as [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) mentions if people need to customize the event types. --- In the Sliding Sync proxy, a similar [`timestamp` field was added](https://github.com/matrix-org/sliding-sync/pull/247) for the same purpose but the name is not obvious what it pertains to or what it's for. The `timestamp` field was also added to Ruma in https://github.com/ruma/ruma/pull/1622
2024-07-08 21:17:08 +03:00
def test_default_bump_event_types(self) -> None:
"""
Test that we only consider the *latest* event in the room when sorting (not
`bump_event_types`).
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
)
message_response = self.helper.send(room_id1, "message in room1", tok=user1_tok)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user1_id,
tok=user1_tok,
)
self.helper.send(room_id2, "message in room2", tok=user1_tok)
# Send a reaction in room1 which isn't in `DEFAULT_BUMP_EVENT_TYPES` but we only
# care about sorting by the *latest* event in the room.
self.helper.send_event(
room_id1,
type=EventTypes.Reaction,
content={
"m.relates_to": {
"event_id": message_response["event_id"],
"key": "👍",
"rel_type": "m.annotation",
}
},
tok=user1_tok,
)
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
sync_room_map = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
sorted_sync_rooms = self.get_success(
self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
)
self.assertEqual(
[room_membership.room_id for room_membership in sorted_sync_rooms],
# room1 sorts before room2 because it has the latest event (the reaction).
# We only care about the *latest* event in the room.
[room_id1, room_id2],
)