mirror of
https://github.com/owncast/owncast.git
synced 2024-11-22 12:49:37 +03:00
update readme
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f70c77458
commit
84f001c344
1 changed files with 18 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -27,28 +27,37 @@ Each form input (or group of inputs) you make, you should
|
|||
|
||||
There are also a variety of other local states to manage the display of error/success messaging.
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes about `form-textfield`
|
||||
## Notes about `form-textfield` and `form-togglefield`
|
||||
- The text field is intentionally designed to make it difficult for the user to submit bad data.
|
||||
- If you make a change on a field, a Submit buttton will show up that you have to click to update. That will be the only way you can update it.
|
||||
- If you clear out a field that is marked as Required, then exit/blur the field, it will repopulate with its original value.
|
||||
|
||||
- Both of these elements are specifically meant to be used with updating `serverConfig` fields, since each field requires its own endpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
- Give these fields a bunch of props, and they will display labelling, some helpful UI around tips, validation messaging, as well as submit the update for you.
|
||||
|
||||
- (currently undergoing re-styling and TS cleanup)
|
||||
|
||||
- NOTE: you don't have to use these components. Some form groups may require a customized UX flow where you're better off using the Ant components straight up.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Using Ant's `<Form>` with `form-textfield`.
|
||||
You may see that a couple of pages (currently **Public Details** and **Server Details** page), is mainly a grouping of similar Text fields.
|
||||
UPDATE: No more `<Form>` use!
|
||||
|
||||
These are utilizing the `<Form>` component, and these calls:
|
||||
- `const [form] = Form.useForm();`
|
||||
- `form.setFieldsValue(initialValues);`
|
||||
~~You may see that a couple of pages (currently **Public Details** and **Server Details** page), is mainly a grouping of similar Text fields.~~
|
||||
|
||||
It seems that a `<Form>` requires its child inputs to be in a `<Form.Item>`, to help manage overall validation on the form before submission.
|
||||
~~These are utilizing the `<Form>` component, and these calls:~~
|
||||
~~- `const [form] = Form.useForm();`~~
|
||||
~~- `form.setFieldsValue(initialValues);`~~
|
||||
|
||||
The `form-textfield` component was created to be used with this Form. It wraps with a `<Form.Item>`, which I believe handles the local state change updates of the value.
|
||||
~~It seems that a `<Form>` requires its child inputs to be in a `<Form.Item>`, to help manage overall validation on the form before submission.~~
|
||||
|
||||
~~The `form-textfield` component was created to be used with this Form. It wraps with a `<Form.Item>`, which I believe handles the local state change updates of the value.~~
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Refactoring:
|
||||
While `Form` + `Form.Item` provides many useful UI features that I'd like to utilize, it's turning out to be too restricting for our uses cases.
|
||||
~~While `Form` + `Form.Item` provides many useful UI features that I'd like to utilize, it's turning out to be too restricting for our uses cases.~~
|
||||
|
||||
I am refactoring `form-textfield` so that it does not rely on `<Form.Item>`. But it will require some extra handling and styling of things like error states and success messaging.
|
||||
~~I am refactoring `form-textfield` so that it does not rely on `<Form.Item>`. But it will require some extra handling and styling of things like error states and success messaging.~~
|
||||
|
||||
### UI things
|
||||
I'm in the middle of refactoring somes tyles and layout, and regorganizing some CSS. See TODO list below.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue