When expanding code diffs, the expansion should search for more context
in the commits repo, rather than in the repo in context, because the
commit may not be available in the base repo. For example, when
previewing a pull request, the commit is not in the target repo yet -
it's in the fork.
Fixes#3746.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 220c3fe3b3)
When rendering templates for packages, be more forgiving about missing
metadata. For some repository types - like maven - metadata is uploaded
separately. If that upload fails, or does not happen, there will be no
metadata.
In that case, Forgejo should handle it gracefully, and render as much of
the information as possible, without erroring out. Rendering without
metadata allows one to delete a partial package, while if we throw
errors, that becomes a whole lot harder.
This patch adjusts the generic metadata template, and also the maven
template. There may be more cases of the same problem lying around.
Fixes#3663.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit ac4d535dbf)
Before explaining the fix itself, lets look at the `action` table, and
how it is populated. Data is only ever inserted into it via
`activities_model.NotifyWatchers`, which will:
- Insert a row for each activity with `UserID` set to the acting user's
ID - this is the original activity, and is always inserted if anything
is to be inserted at all.
- It will insert a copy of each activity with the `UserID` set to the
repo's owner, if the owner is an Organization, and isn't the acting
user.
- It will insert a copy of each activity for every watcher of the repo,
as long as the watcher in question has read permission to the repo
unit the activity is about.
This means that if a repository belongs to an organizations, for most
activities, it will have at least two rows in the table. For
repositories watched by people other than their owner, an additional row
for each watcher.
These are useful duplicates, because they record which activities are
relevant for a particular user. However, for cases where we wish to see
the activities that happen around a repository, without limiting the
results to a particular user, we're *not* interested in the duplicates
stored for the watchers and the org. We only need the originals.
And this is what this change does: it introduces an additional option to
`GetFeedsOptions`: `OnlyPerformedByActor`. When this option is set,
`activities.GetFeeds()` will only return the original activities, where
the user id and the acting user id are the same. As these are *always*
inserted, we're not missing out on any activities. We're just getting
rid of the duplicates. As this is an additional `AND` condition, it can
never introduce items that would not have been included in the result
set before, it can only reduce, not extend.
These duplicates were only affecting call sites where `RequestedRepo`
was set, but `RequestedUser` and `RequestedTeam` were not. Both of those
call sites were updated to set `OnlyPerformedByActor`. As a result,
repository RSS feeds, and the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/activities/feeds`
API end points no longer return dupes, only the original activities.
Rather than hardcoding this behaviour into `GetFeeds()` itself, I chose
to implement it as an explicit option, for the sake of clarity.
FixesCodeberg/Community#684, and addresses gitea#20986.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 9cb2aa989a)
Fix#30807
reuse functions in services
(cherry picked from commit a50026e2f30897904704895362da0fb12c7e5b26)
Conflicts:
models/issues/issue_update.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 6a4bc0289d)
We should be listing all repositories by default.
Fixes#28483.
(cherry picked from commit 9f0ef3621a3b63ccbe93f302a446b67dc54ad725)
Conflict:
- if ctx.IsSigned && ctx.Doer.IsAdmin || permission.UnitAccessMode(unit_model.TypeCode) >= perm.AccessModeRead {
+ if ctx.IsSigned && ctx.Doer.IsAdmin || permission.HasAccess() {
because of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2001
(cherry picked from commit e388822e9d)
Before, we would just throw 500 if a user passes an attachment that is
not an allowed type. This commit catches this error and throws a 422
instead since this should be considered a validation error.
(cherry picked from commit 872caa17c0a30d95f85ab75c068d606e07bd10b3)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_comment_attachment_test.go
tests/integration/api_issue_attachment_test.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 9cd0441cd3)
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit be112c1fc30f87a248b30f48e891d1c8c18e8280)
Conflicts:
routers/web/web.go
trivial conflict because of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1533
(cherry picked from commit 4e35e5b8ae)
To be able to easily test cases where the repository does not have any
code, where the git repo itself is completely uninitialized, lets
support a case where the `AutoInit` property is false.
For the sake of backwards compatibility, if the option is not set either
way, it will default to `true`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Add a new member to `DeclarativeRepoOptions`: `WikiBranch`. If
specified, create a Wiki with the given branch, and a single "Home"
page.
This will be used by an upcoming test.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Lets introduce a new helper function,
`CreateDeclarativeRepoWithOptions`! This is almost the same as the
existing `CreateDeclarativeRepo` helper, but instead of taking a list of
random parameters the author thought of at the time of its introduction,
it takes a `DeclarativeRepoOptions` struct, with optional members.
This makes it easier to extend the function, as new members can be added
without breaking or having to update existing callsites, as long as the
newly added members default to compatible values.
`CreateDeclarativeRepo` is then reimplemented on top of the new
function. Callsites aren't updated yet, we can do that organically,
whenever touching code that uses the older function.
No new functionality is introduced just yet, this is merely a refactor.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Backport #30770
If an user is deactivated, it should not be in the list of users who are
suggested to be assigned or review-requested.
old assignees or reviewers are not affected.
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
(cherry picked from commit 022eac4ac8e59f861237cc1e02f7ef117eaf8e30)
Conflicts:
models/repo/user_repo_test.go
because there is one less fixture user compared to Gitea
When all repository units are deactivated except for the code unit, the activity tab will not be shown.
Since the activities tab also shows contributing stats, it would be good to show the activities tab also when only code is active.
This commit changes the behavior when the activities tab is shown.
Previous it would only be shown when Issues, Pull-Requests or Releases are activated. Now it would additionally be shown when the code unit is activated.
Refs: #3429
| Before (Code + Issues - Owner) | Before (Code - Viewer) | After (Code + Issues - Owner) | After (Code - Viewer) |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
|  |  |  |  |
| | `/activity` returns 404 for everyone |  | - |
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3455
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-committed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
(cherry picked from commit c54896ba70)
When converting a `repo_model.Repository` to `api.Repository`, copy the
`ObjectFormatName` field too.
Fixes#3458.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 2385f3c9db)
When in the repository settings, visiting
- `LFS` to `/{owner}/{repo}/settings/lfs`
- `Find pointer files` to `/{owner}/{repo}/settings/lfs/pointers`
- `Find commits` to `/{owner}/{repo}/settings/lfs/find?oid=...`
failed with an error 500 because of an incorrect evaluation of the
template.
Regression introduced by
cbf923e87b
A test is added to visit the page and guard against future
regressions.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3438
(cherry picked from commit 078229a5e4)
Also has a backport of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3465/files to ensure the test fails.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3451
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30512
I think this does mean those tools would run on a potential `vendor`
directory, but I'm not sure we really support vendoring of dependencies
anymore.
`release` has a `vendor` prerequisite so likely the source tarballs
contain vendor files?
(cherry picked from commit 8e12ef911a1d10dedb03e3127c42ca76f9850aca)
Conflicts:
- Makefile
Manually adjusted the changes.
(cherry picked from commit 3918db10c8)
It is possible to change some repo settings (its visibility, and
template status) via `git push` options: `-o repo.private=true`, `-o
repo.template=true`.
Previously, there weren't sufficient permission checks on these, and
anyone who could `git push` to a repository - including via an AGit
workflow! - was able to change either of these settings. To guard
against this, the pre-receive hook will now check if either of these
options are present, and if so, will perform additional permission
checks to ensure that these can only be set by a repository owner or
an administrator. Additionally, changing these settings is disabled for
forks, even for the fork's owner.
There's still a case where the owner of a repository can change the
visibility of it, and it will not propagate to forks (it propagates to
forks when changing the visibility via the API), but that's an
inconsistency, not a security issue.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Signed-off-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8eba631f8d)
This is a continuation of #2728, with a test case added.
Fixes#2633.
I kept @zareck 's commit as is, because I believe it is correct. We can't move the check to `owner.CanForkRepo()`, because `owner` is the future owner of the forked repo, and may be an organization. We need to check the admin permission of the `doer`, like in the case of repository creation.
I verified that the test fails without the `ForkRepository` change, and passes with it.
Co-authored-by: Cassio Zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3277
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-committed-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit ea4071ca9f)
- Previously translations were escaped, but now translations are
accepted as-is and will be rendered as HTML. Use `TrString` to escape
the translation value.
- Adds integration test.
- Regression of 65248945c9.
- Resolves#3260
(cherry picked from commit a0f47b8de7)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30428
---
Conflict resolution: trivial and move test to own subtest run directly
after `Normal`.
(cherrypicked commit 9466fec879f4f2c88c7c1e7a5cffba319282ab66)
(cherry picked from commit db39b8f4a7)
When visiting a repos `/settings/units` page, highlight the active tab
properly: "Add more..." if the tab is displayed, or "Settings"
otherwise.
Fixes#3188.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 65ed86e396)
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* A Created field is added to the Issue table
* The Created field is set to the time (with nano resolution) on creation
* Record the nano time repo_module.PushUpdateOptions is created by the hook
* The decision to update a pull request created before a commit was
pushed is based on the time (with nano resolution) the git hook
was run and the Created field
It ensures the following happens:
* commit C is pushed
* the git hook queues AddTestPullRequestTask for processing and returns with success
* TestPullRequest is not called yet
* a pull request P with commit C as the head is created
* TestPullRequest runs and ignores P because it was created after the commit was received
When the "created" column is NULL, no verification is done, pull
requests that were created before the column was created in the
database cannot be newer than the latest call to a git hook.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
(cherry picked from commit 998a431747)
Conflicts:
models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go
see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3165#issuecomment-1755941
services/pull/pull.go
trivial conflicts
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3046
This PR fixes an issue in the diff compare view, where when working on a fork that has not the same name as the upstream repo, the "View file" button links to a wrong, often missing, location.
Demonstration of this issue:
- Visit https://next.forgejo.org/mai-lapyst-test-org/upstream/compare/main...Mai-Lapyst/downstream:mai-lapyst-patch-1.
- Click the "View file" button of the patch.
- Get taken to `4fe947d522/README.md` (which does not exist and returns a 404) instead of `4fe947d522/README.md`. Note the different repository name (`upstream` vs `downstream`).
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3077
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1518
An attempt at adding an optional pronoun field for user profiles, as suggested here 3 years ago: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13990
I made this for [my own instance](https://git.gay/h) and didn't initially think I'd make a PR because of the previous closed issue, but I thought I'd ask the Forgejo matrix chat to see if there was any support and there was!
I'm told I should make a database migration, some help as to how to do that would be appreciated.
Co-authored-by: hazycora <hazysu@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3076
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
