- Have TagOrderStore listen for MatrixSync actions so that it can initialise
tag ordering state.
- Expose an empty list until the client has done its first sync and has
fetched list of joined groups
This introduces a generic way to register certain events emitted by
the js-sdk as those that should be propagated through as dispatched
actions.
This allows the store to treat the js-sdk as the "Server" in the
Flux data flow model. It also allows for stores to not be aware
specifically of the matrix client if they are only reading from it.
These can be used to dispatch actions immediately, or after some asynchronous
work has been done. Also, create GroupActions.fetchJoinedGroups as an example.
The concept of async action creators can be used in the following cases:
- stores or views that do async work, dispatching based on the results
- actions that have complicated payloads, would make more sense as functions
with documentation that dispatch created actions.
such that:
- it takes a targetTag to be replaced instead the previous tag to insert after
- it optionally displaces the targetTag before or after the inserted tag
This allows for filtering of the RoomList by group. When a group is selected, the room list will show:
- Rooms in the group
- Direct messages with members in the group
A button at the bottom of the TagPanel allows for creating new groups, which will appear in the panel following creation.
Previously, a single user could end up in multiple batches, which would have been fine if the logic didn't assume otherwise. If a request took longer than 200ms, multiple batches would occur with intersecting sets of users, deleting promises that were then assumed to exist.
The logic now takes all "in flight" users to also not be "pending". Pending now means that the user will be processed in the next batch. "In flight" means the user is part of an ongoing batch.
This uses a `ready` flag assigned to each fetching API used by the GroupServer. I've avoided making this generic for now for want of not doing so early.
This will make invalidating the userGroups cache for the user architecturally more sound (the plan is to have GroupStore hit FlairStore as opposed to Flair itself in order to invalidate the cache).
