mirror of
https://github.com/element-hq/element-web
synced 2024-11-26 11:15:53 +03:00
Fix expectations in edit tests: edits should not cause unread (#11682)
* Fix expectations in edit tests: edits should not cause unread * Skip flaky test
This commit is contained in:
Andy Balaam
GitHub
parent
9a76d6b9a3
commit
1897962086
1 changed files with 55 additions and 74 deletions
|
|
@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ import { HomeserverInstance } from "../../plugins/utils/homeserver";
|
|||
import {
|
||||
assertRead,
|
||||
assertReadThread,
|
||||
assertStillRead,
|
||||
assertUnread,
|
||||
assertUnreadThread,
|
||||
backToThreadsList,
|
||||
goTo,
|
||||
markAsRead,
|
||||
|
|
@ -129,9 +129,8 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
|
||||
describe("editing messages", () => {
|
||||
describe("in the main timeline", () => {
|
||||
// TODO: this passes but we think this should fail, because we think edits should not cause unreads.
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a message makes a room unread", () => {
|
||||
it("Editing a message leaves a room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given I am not looking at the room
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -144,11 +143,10 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When an edit appears in the room
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then it becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then it remains read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Reading an edit makes the room read", () => {
|
||||
it("Reading an edit leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given an edit is making the room unread
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1"]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -159,30 +157,15 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// When I read it
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes read and stays read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
// Then the room stays read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
it("Marking a room as read after an edit makes it read", () => {
|
||||
// Given an edit is making a room unread
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1"]);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// When I mark it as read
|
||||
markAsRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a message after marking as read makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -199,14 +182,11 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// Then the room becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a reply after reading it makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
it("Editing a reply after reading it makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
// Given the room is all read
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", replyTo("Msg1", "Reply1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
|
|
@ -214,8 +194,8 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When a message is edited
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Reply1", "Reply1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then it becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then it remains read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a reply after marking as read makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -229,11 +209,11 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When the reply is edited
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Reply1", "Reply1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then the room remains read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("A room with an edit is still unread after restart", () => {
|
||||
it("A room with an edit is still read after restart", () => {
|
||||
// Given a message is marked as read
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1"]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -243,12 +223,12 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When an edit appears in the room
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then it becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then it remains read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// And remains so after a reload
|
||||
saveAndReload();
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
it("An edited message becomes read if it happens while I am looking", () => {
|
||||
// Given a message is marked as read
|
||||
|
|
@ -260,7 +240,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then it becomes read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
it("A room where all edits are read is still read after restart", () => {
|
||||
// Given a message was edited and read
|
||||
|
|
@ -294,14 +274,14 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When a message inside it is edited
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Resp1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room and thread are unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then the room and thread are read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
assertUnreadThread("Msg1");
|
||||
assertReadThread("Msg1");
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("Reading an edit of a threaded message makes the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given an edited thread message is making the room unread
|
||||
// Given an edited thread message appears after we read it
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 2);
|
||||
|
|
@ -311,14 +291,14 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
backToThreadsList();
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Resp1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// When I read it
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
openThread("Msg1");
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room and thread are read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
// Then the room and thread are still read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
assertReadThread("Msg1");
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because the room is still "bold" even though the notification counts all disappear
|
||||
|
|
@ -335,7 +315,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because the unread dot remains after marking as read
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread message after marking as read makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread message after marking as read leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a room is marked as read
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -347,31 +327,32 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Resp1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1); // TODO: should this edit make us unread?
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("A room with an edited threaded message is still unread after restart", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("A room with an edited threaded message is still read after restart", () => {
|
||||
// Given an edit in a thread is making a room unread
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
markAsRead(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Resp1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// When I restart
|
||||
saveAndReload();
|
||||
|
||||
// Then is it still unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
it("A room where all threaded edits are read is still read after restart", () => {
|
||||
// XXX: fails because it flakes, sometimes having 2 unread messages instead of 1
|
||||
it.skip("A room where all threaded edits are read is still read after restart", () => {
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1"), editOf("Resp1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
openThread("Msg1");
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1); // Make sure we are looking at room1 after reload
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
saveAndReload();
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
|
|
@ -394,7 +375,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
|
||||
describe("thread roots", () => {
|
||||
// XXX: fails because we see a dot instead of an unread number - probably the server and client disagree
|
||||
it.skip("An edit of a thread root makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("An edit of a thread root leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given I have read a thread
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -408,15 +389,15 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When the thread root is edited
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room is unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then the room is read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// But the thread is read
|
||||
// And the thread is read
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
assertReadThread("Edit1");
|
||||
});
|
||||
it("Reading an edit of a thread root makes the room read", () => {
|
||||
it("Reading an edit of a thread root leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a fully-read thread exists
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -432,12 +413,12 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes read and stays read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because it shows a dot instead of unread count
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread root after reading makes the room unread", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread root after reading leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a fully-read thread exists
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -448,11 +429,11 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When the thread root is edited
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, [editOf("Msg1", "Msg1 Edit1")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
// Then the room stays read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because the room has an unread dot after I marked it as read
|
||||
it.skip("Marking a room as read after an edit of a thread root makes it read", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("Marking a room as read after an edit of a thread root keeps it read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a fully-read thread exists
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg1", threadedOff("Msg1", "Resp1")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -468,12 +449,12 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
markAsRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room becomes read and stays read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because the room has an unread dot after I marked it as read
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread root that is a reply after marking as read makes the room unread but not the thread", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("Editing a thread root that is a reply after marking as read leaves the room read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a thread based on a reply exists and is read because it is marked as read
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg", replyTo("Msg", "Reply"), threadedOff("Reply", "InThread")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -484,15 +465,15 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
// When I edit the thread root
|
||||
receiveMessages(room1, [editOf("Reply", "Edited Reply")]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room is unread
|
||||
assertUnread(room2, 1);
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
// Then the room is read
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// But the thread is still read (because the root is not part of the thread)
|
||||
// And the thread is read
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
assertReadThread("EditedReply");
|
||||
});
|
||||
// XXX: fails because the room has an unread dot after I marked it as read
|
||||
it.skip("Marking a room as read after an edit of a thread root that is a reply makes it read", () => {
|
||||
it.skip("Marking a room as read after an edit of a thread root that is a reply leaves it read", () => {
|
||||
// Given a thread based on a reply exists and the reply has been edited
|
||||
goTo(room1);
|
||||
receiveMessages(room2, ["Msg", replyTo("Msg", "Reply"), threadedOff("Reply", "InThread")]);
|
||||
|
|
@ -503,7 +484,7 @@ describe("Read receipts", () => {
|
|||
markAsRead(room2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the room and thread are read
|
||||
assertRead(room2);
|
||||
assertStillRead(room2);
|
||||
goTo(room2);
|
||||
assertReadThread("Edited Reply");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue