element-web/src/utils/replaceableComponent.ts

45 lines
1.9 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

Implementation of new potential skinning mechanism With a switch to Only One Webpack™ we need a way to help developers generate the component index without a concurrent watch task. The best way to do this is to have developers import their components, but how do they do that when we support skins? The answer in this commit is to change skinning. Skinning now expects to receive your list of overrides instead of the react-sdk+branded components. For Riot this means we send over *only* the Vector components and not Vector+react-sdk. Components can then be annotated with the `replaceComponent` decorator to have them be skinnable. The decorator must take a string with the dot path of the component because we can't reliably calculate it ourselves, sadly. The decorator does a call to `getComponent` which is where the important part of the branded components not including the react-sdk is important: if the branded app includes the react-sdk then the decorator gets executed before the skin has finished loading, leading to all kinds of fun errors. This is also why the skinner lazily loads the react-sdk components to avoid importing them too early, breaking the app. The decorator will end up receiving null for a component because of the getComponent loop mentioned: the require() call is still in progress when the decorator is called, therefore we can't error out. All usages of getComponent() within the app are safe to not need such an error (the return won't be null, and developers shouldn't use getComponent() after this commit anyways). The AuthPage, being a prominent component, has been converted to demonstrate this working. Changes to riot-web are required to have this work. The reskindex script has also been altered to reflect these skinning changes - it no longer should set the react-sdk as a parent. The eventual end goal is to get rid of `getComponent()` entirely as it'll be easily replaced by imports.
2019-12-13 05:31:52 +03:00
/*
Copyright 2019 The Matrix.org Foundation C.I.C.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/
import React from 'react';
import * as sdk from '../index';
Implementation of new potential skinning mechanism With a switch to Only One Webpack™ we need a way to help developers generate the component index without a concurrent watch task. The best way to do this is to have developers import their components, but how do they do that when we support skins? The answer in this commit is to change skinning. Skinning now expects to receive your list of overrides instead of the react-sdk+branded components. For Riot this means we send over *only* the Vector components and not Vector+react-sdk. Components can then be annotated with the `replaceComponent` decorator to have them be skinnable. The decorator must take a string with the dot path of the component because we can't reliably calculate it ourselves, sadly. The decorator does a call to `getComponent` which is where the important part of the branded components not including the react-sdk is important: if the branded app includes the react-sdk then the decorator gets executed before the skin has finished loading, leading to all kinds of fun errors. This is also why the skinner lazily loads the react-sdk components to avoid importing them too early, breaking the app. The decorator will end up receiving null for a component because of the getComponent loop mentioned: the require() call is still in progress when the decorator is called, therefore we can't error out. All usages of getComponent() within the app are safe to not need such an error (the return won't be null, and developers shouldn't use getComponent() after this commit anyways). The AuthPage, being a prominent component, has been converted to demonstrate this working. Changes to riot-web are required to have this work. The reskindex script has also been altered to reflect these skinning changes - it no longer should set the react-sdk as a parent. The eventual end goal is to get rid of `getComponent()` entirely as it'll be easily replaced by imports.
2019-12-13 05:31:52 +03:00
/**
* Replaces a component with a skinned version if a skinned version exists.
* This decorator should only be applied to components which can be skinned. For
* the react-sdk this means all components should be decorated with this.
*
* The decoration works by assuming the skin has been loaded prior to the
* decorator being called. If that's not the case, the developer will find
* out quickly through various amounts of errors and explosions.
*
* For a bit more detail on how this works, see docs/skinning.md
* @param {string} name The dot-path name of the component being replaced.
* @param {React.Component} origComponent The component that can be replaced
* with a skinned version. If no skinned version is available, this component
* will be used.
*/
2020-01-28 15:44:14 +03:00
export function replaceableComponent<T extends{new(...args:any[])}>(name: string) {
// Decorators return a function to override the class (origComponent). This
// ultimately assumes that `getComponent()` won't throw an error and instead
// return a falsey value like `null` when the skin doesn't have a component.
2020-01-28 15:44:14 +03:00
return (origComponent) => {
const c = sdk.getComponent(name) || origComponent;
c.kind = "class"; // appeases babel
return c;
};
Implementation of new potential skinning mechanism With a switch to Only One Webpack™ we need a way to help developers generate the component index without a concurrent watch task. The best way to do this is to have developers import their components, but how do they do that when we support skins? The answer in this commit is to change skinning. Skinning now expects to receive your list of overrides instead of the react-sdk+branded components. For Riot this means we send over *only* the Vector components and not Vector+react-sdk. Components can then be annotated with the `replaceComponent` decorator to have them be skinnable. The decorator must take a string with the dot path of the component because we can't reliably calculate it ourselves, sadly. The decorator does a call to `getComponent` which is where the important part of the branded components not including the react-sdk is important: if the branded app includes the react-sdk then the decorator gets executed before the skin has finished loading, leading to all kinds of fun errors. This is also why the skinner lazily loads the react-sdk components to avoid importing them too early, breaking the app. The decorator will end up receiving null for a component because of the getComponent loop mentioned: the require() call is still in progress when the decorator is called, therefore we can't error out. All usages of getComponent() within the app are safe to not need such an error (the return won't be null, and developers shouldn't use getComponent() after this commit anyways). The AuthPage, being a prominent component, has been converted to demonstrate this working. Changes to riot-web are required to have this work. The reskindex script has also been altered to reflect these skinning changes - it no longer should set the react-sdk as a parent. The eventual end goal is to get rid of `getComponent()` entirely as it'll be easily replaced by imports.
2019-12-13 05:31:52 +03:00
}